My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-05-28 PL-BOA-2024-000105 Petition (1250)_v1
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000105 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-05-28 PL-BOA-2024-000105 Petition (1250)_v1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2024 11:00:49 AM
Creation date
5/29/2024 11:00:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
express construction standards for these roadways; or whether a roadway subject to a properly <br /> granted variance from Hawaii County Code ("HCC") §§ 23-86 and 23-95 can be in full <br /> compliance with HCC Chapter 23. The Planning Director's failure to rule upon these Requests — <br /> after acknowledging that they were within his jurisdiction under PD Rule 3 —was not grounded <br /> in HRS § 91-8 or any provision of PD Rule 3, and was therefore an abuse of discretion. <br /> 2. The Planning Director Erred by Not Issuing the Declaratory Rulings on <br /> these Requests Set Forth in Oceanside's Petition. <br /> The Planning Director further erred by not issuing the declaratory rulings on the above <br /> Requests set forth in Oceanside's Petition. Oceanside requests that the BOA either modify the <br /> Declaratory Order to issue the declaratory rulings on these Requests set forth in Oceanside's <br /> Petition, or remand the matter back to the Planning Director to do the same. <br /> a. Dedication Requirements, Request 1. <br /> Dedication Requirements, Request 1 asked the Planning Director to issue a declaratory <br /> ruling on "[w]hether the express terms of Ordinance No. 96-7 require the dedication of the <br /> Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension, or Connector Road[.]" See Exhibit 2 at <br /> 13. As explained in Oceanside's Petition, the answer to this Request is no. Id. at 16-17. <br /> The word"dedicate" (or any variation thereof) appears nowhere in Ordinance No. 96-7. <br /> See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya, 142 Hawai`i 439, 449, 420 P.3d 370, 380 (2018) (internal <br /> citations omitted) ("The fundamental starting point of statutory interpretation is the language of <br /> the statute itself,' and `where the statutory language is unambiguous, our duty is to give effect to <br /> its plain and obvious meaning.'). Nor does Ordinance No. 96-7 incorporate by reference any of <br /> the requirements of Ordinance No. 96-8. See Exhibit 3,passim. Simply put, there is no <br /> requirement under the express terms of Ordinance No. 96-7 that the roadways required under <br /> Conditions M(4) and M(5)be dedicated to the County. <br /> 4860-3160-4157.3.051730- 00058 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.