Laserfiche WebLink
of the central issues the Circuit Court directed the parties to seek from the Planning Director. <br /> Exhibit 7a at 5, ¶5(a)(d) & (e); Exhibit 7b at 5, ¶4(d) & (e). <br /> DEDICATION OF MAUKA HALEKI`I EXTENSION <br /> 44. The Mauka Haleki`i Extension was dedicated to the County in 2012 pursuant to <br /> Hawai`i County Council Resolution No. 317-12. Exhibit 9. <br /> 45. The Planning Director testified that the dedication of the Mauka Haleki`i <br /> Extension in 2012 satisfied the Ordinances as they relate to the Mauka Haleki`i Extension. See <br /> Video of Hearing starting at 2:06:50 (testifying that"The dedication of that Mauka Haleki`i did <br /> satisfy the dedication requirements for that section of the road for the Ordinances, yes."). <br /> 46. The Planning Director testified that the Declaratory Order does not qualify or <br /> limit the effect and validity of either the 2012 dedication of the Mauka Haleki`i Extension to the <br /> County, or Oceanside's satisfaction of the Ordinances as they relate to the Mauka Haleki`i <br /> Extension. See Video of Hearing starting at 2:07:20 (testifying that his determination was not <br /> qualified). <br /> MAKAI EXTENSION AND CONNECTOR ROAD <br /> 47. The Planning Director testified that DPW, and not the Planning Department, has <br /> the jurisdiction to determine whether a roadway can be accepted for dedication. See Video of <br /> Hearing at 2:09:25. <br /> 48. The Planning Director testified that the Declaratory Order does not make any <br /> findings, conclusions, or determinations as to whether the Makai Haleki`i Extension and <br /> Connector Road can be dedicated in their current condition. See Video of Hearing at 2:10:10. <br /> 49. The Planning Director testified that Ordinance No. 96-8 does not set a deadline, <br /> date certain, or development milestone by which the Makai Haleki`i Extension and Connector <br /> 18 <br /> 4897-0598-6819.1.00DBS 1-00001 <br />