Laserfiche WebLink
44-.12. Planning Director did not abuse his discretion when he relied on caselaw as the <br /> basis for declining to review or affirm past actions or decisions of agencies of the County and the <br /> Hawaii County Council. <br /> 4-2--.13. The Planning Director correctly identified issues and questions outside the <br /> Planning Director's jurisdiction and discretion. <br /> 4-3-.14. Planning Director was not required to inform the Appellant of their compliance <br /> obligations under Ord. 96-7 and Ord. 96-8, or provide the specific information sought by <br /> Appellant. <br /> 4415. The Order sufficiently addressed the questions raised by the Appellant even <br /> though the Order did not reflect the level of clarity or specifics desired by the Appellant. <br /> 4-516. Having considered the testimony and evidence provided, including the submitted <br /> exhibits, the Board unanimously concluded the Planning Director in issuing the Order did not <br /> clearly err, was not arbitrary or capricious, nor did he abuse his discretion. Therefore, the Board <br /> affirmed Zendo Kern, Planning Director, County of Hawai'is Declaratory Order In the Matter of <br /> 1250 Oceanside, LLC, Petitioner, Docket No. 24-0002. <br /> DECISION AND ORDER <br /> Based on its consideration of the evidence and argument presented at hearing, including <br /> the Record on Appeal, the documents on file herein, and applying the reliable probative evidence <br /> and law, the Board hereby Orders as follows: <br /> 10 <br />