My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-09-25 C&J Coupe Exhibit List, Exhibits 1-5 (PL-BOA-2024-000105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000105 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-09-25 C&J Coupe Exhibit List, Exhibits 1-5 (PL-BOA-2024-000105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2024 10:04:26 AM
Creation date
9/26/2024 9:29:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
540
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
29. Specifically at issue here, the Development Agreement and Incorporated <br /> Ordinances require the timely,public dedication of Required Public Roads within Hokulia. <br /> 30. Each of the three Required Public Roads were to be timely dedicated to County as <br /> important public infrastructure under the express terms of the Development Agreement and <br /> Incorporated Ordinances, and, as such, needed to be built in strict compliance to County <br /> dedication standards as dictated under Chapter 23 of the Hawaii County Code. However, rather <br /> than enforce these conditions, County has ignored their obligations without enforcement of any <br /> kind. <br /> 31. Oceanside has breached the Development Agreement and its Incorporated <br /> Ordinances by (1) building the Required Public Roads substandard to the requirements of the <br /> Code, (2) failing to timely, publically dedicate the Required Public Roads to County dedicable <br /> standards, and (3) erecting Guard Facility on the Required Public Roads in efforts to prey upon <br /> the unsuspecting public and market their community as a private gated community with security <br /> personnel on duty 24/7. <br /> 32. As such, Oceanside has been able to unlawfully profit by reaping the benefit of <br /> the Development Agreement without having to bear materials and costs, in the millions of <br /> dollars, required to comply with these most important burdens. <br /> 33. The second major issue here is the fact that County and Oceanside have twice <br /> over (as far as we know) attempted to sub-silentio unlawfully amend the Development <br /> Agreement and Incorporated Ordinances through improper, unconstitutional, and illegal means, <br /> via a variance and pursuant to a sham dedication. In both situations, Plaintiff, as a neighboring <br /> landowner, was not provided with the requisite notice of Oceanside and County's true efforts to <br /> circumvent the legal process. <br /> 8 <br /> 710088 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.