My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-06-20 PL-BOA-2024-000105 1250 OCEANSIDE, LLC. vs Planning Director PL-INT-2024-007099 Record on Appeal
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000105 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-06-20 PL-BOA-2024-000105 1250 OCEANSIDE, LLC. vs Planning Director PL-INT-2024-007099 Record on Appeal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2024 10:20:34 AM
Creation date
6/26/2024 9:16:32 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HCC & 23-95 (Right-of-was, improvements): "The subdivider shall be required to <br /> improve the entire street right-of-way. The improvements shall conform to the standard <br /> specifications on file with the department of public works." <br /> D. Variance No. VAR 10-027. <br /> At issue here is Variance No. VAR 10-027, approved by the Planning Director by letter <br /> dated January 31.2011. Exhibit G. The Variance granted relief from HCC § 23-86 <br /> (requirements for dedicable streets)and HCC § 23-95 (right-of-way improvement)for the Makai <br /> Haleki`i Extension, Mauka Haleki`i Extension, and Connector Road. Specifically,the Variance <br /> allowed for the "retention of existing and construction of new private 20-foot wide roadways <br /> with 50 and 60-foot wide rights-of-way within a multi-phased residential subdivision(Hokulia). <br /> The requested road section would be to omit the requirement for grading and paving of the road <br /> shoulders and replace with grassed shoulders." Exhibit G at 1. <br /> VI. STATEMENT OF THE CONTROVERSY OR UNCERTAINTY INVOLVED. <br /> At the heart of Coupe's lawsuit is whether Oceanside is in compliance with the <br /> Ordinances and, by extension,the Development Agreement. To resolve that broad question, and <br /> to ensure Oceanside has certainty as it continues to develop Hokuli`a, Petitioner requests <br /> declaratory rulings on the questions below, broken down by subject matter. To the extent the <br /> Planning Director determines that any question below, or any portion thereof, falls outside of his <br /> authority and jurisdiction under HRS § 91-8 and PD Rule 3,Petitioner requests that the Planning <br /> Director issue declaratory rulings on all remaining questions and all portions thereof that are <br /> within his authority and jurisdiction. <br /> Dedication Requirements. Coupe has asserted various allegations related to the nature <br /> and extent of the roadway dedication obligations under the Ordinances and Development <br /> 4862-5574-$005.3.051730-00058 -12 <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.