Laserfiche WebLink
rs, <br /> Director's decision on a variance application other than by filing an appeal with the <br /> Board of Appeals within thirty days of the Planning Director's written decision on the <br /> variance application? <br /> 6. Did the Variance violate any statute, ordinance, rule, or order within the Planning <br /> Director's jurisdiction related to amending County rezoning ordinances? <br /> 7. Did the Variance violate any statute, ordinance, rule, or order within the Planning <br /> Director's jurisdiction related to amending development agreements? <br /> Dedication of the Haleki`i Extension. Coupe has asserted various allegations regarding <br /> the dedication of the Mauka Haleki'i Extension, including the effect of the Resolution No. 317- <br /> 12, authorizing the County to accept the dedication (the "Resolution"). Exhibit H. Accordingly, <br /> Petitioner requests declaratory rulings from the Planning Director on the following: <br /> 1. As of November 9, 2012, did any statute, ordinance, rule, or order within the Planning <br /> Director's jurisdiction require notice of the Resolution to be served on neighboring <br /> property owners? <br /> 2. Did adoption of the Resolution violate any statute, ordinance, rule, or order within the <br /> Planning Director's,jurisdiction related to amending rezoning ordinances? <br /> 3. Did adoption of the Resolution violate any statute, ordinance, rule, or order within the <br /> Planning Director's jurisdiction related to amending development agreements? <br /> VII. JURISDICTION AND LEGAL STANDARD. <br /> HRS § 91-8 provides that"[a]ny interested person may petition an agency for a <br /> declaratory order as to the applicability of any statutory provision or of any rule or order of the <br /> agency." Consistent with this, PD Rule 3-I(a) authorizes the Planning Director"to issue a <br /> declaratory order as to the applicability of any statutory provision,ordinance,or of any rule or <br /> order of the Director or the [Planning] Department." HRS § 91-8 and PD Rule 3-1 are"designed <br /> to provide a means for securing from an agency its interpretation of relevant statutes, rules and <br /> orders." See In re United Pub. Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-C10, Union, 131 Hawaii <br /> 142, 152, 315 P.3d 768, 778 (Ct. App. 2013), as corrected (Feb. 21, 2014). <br /> 4862-5574-8005.3.051730-00058 -15- <br /> 19 <br />