My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-04-13 PL-BOA-2026-000132 Petition
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2026-000132 KISMET LLC (DPW)
>
2026-04-13 PL-BOA-2026-000132 Petition
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2026 10:11:55 AM
Creation date
4/22/2026 10:11:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Two of the main issues in this case concern the swimming pool that has <br /> been on the premises for many years and the use of the "temporary office & lounge" as <br /> permanent office and guest reception area. When the landowner submitted a Special <br /> Management Area ("SMA") assessment to county officials in 2021 to make further <br /> renovations to the hotel building, pool and deck area, and premises as a whole, county <br /> officials made the following observations: <br /> The hotel has been in place for seventy years; <br /> (*) The shoreline has been "hardened" by pool construction; <br /> (*) Repairs were proposed to the existing pool and deck. <br /> In addition, county officials observed that: <br /> (1) A rock wall on the north side exceeds six feet in height; ? <br /> (2) The height of the existing rock wall on the makai side of Alii Drive <br /> was increased from its then existing height of two feet. 3 <br /> ' No one questioned the fact that a pool was built on the property many years ago. <br /> For reasons unknown, building permits for the pool's construction and shoreline <br /> hardening have not been found. <br /> 2 The neighboring landowner was allowed to improve this rock wall and apparently <br /> increased the height of the existing stone wall beyond the six-foot height limitation. <br /> 3 The property is registered with the Land Court with Application 1595. The area <br /> on which the then existing rock wall was and is located lies outside of the Land Court lot <br /> boundaries and on what would have been "public land" that had been ceded to the <br /> United States. Jurisdictional questions exist as to who owns the area in question —the <br /> state or the county as a "road in limbo." <br /> When the county constructed drainage improvements for Waiaha Stream, <br /> located in the immediate vicinity of the hotel property (on the south side), the landowner <br /> increased the height of the existing two-foot high stone wall to protect the landowner's <br /> property, to continue to direct water to the county's new drainage facilities and to <br /> "match" the appearance of the rock wall that was built on the mauka side of Alii Drive. <br /> When county officials inspected the county's bridge repair work and drainage <br /> improvements, they were aware of the landowner's concurrent work to increase the <br /> height of the existing rock wall. (continued next page) <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.