My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-09-11 Petition Filed Via Email
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2025-000125 Kona Plantation LLC
>
2025-09-11 Petition Filed Via Email
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2025 8:00:03 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 7:57:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hawai i lawyer.com® <br /> DAMON KEY LEONG KUPCHAK HASTERT <br /> A LAW CORPORATION <br /> Kona Plantation, LLC <br /> September 11, 2025 <br /> Page 4 <br /> III. ANALYSIS <br /> 1. Owner has not Violated the 2008 Settlement. <br /> Pursuant to Section 1(g) of the 2008 Settlement, said document "supersede[d] and <br /> replace[d]"the 2004 Settlement. That being said, the 2008 Settlement does not prohibit the use of <br /> the Property as a "vacation rental" nor does it prohibit the Owner from establishing a website to <br /> advertise the Property. The 2008 Settlement simply requires that Unit A "shall not be occupied at <br /> any given time by more than five unrelated persons" and that Unit B "shall be occupied only by <br /> those individuals involved in the agricultural or farm related activity on the Property." Owner has <br /> adhered to both of these requirements. <br /> First, County unlawfully and erroneously levies allegations against Owner that they have <br /> violated a settlement obligation to only rent Unit A to no more than five unrelated persons, <br /> however, they provide no evidence to corroborate this assertion. This is likely due to the simple <br /> fact that no such evidence exists, after all, the "Ohana Retreat" is aptly named and Unit A is and <br /> has only ever been advertised for"large famil[ies]". In order to comport with the 2008 Settlement, <br /> Owners have always maintained that the while 8-bedrooms are available for rent in Unit A, said <br /> premises capacity could only be reached so long as no more than five unrelated persons were <br /> renting it. This has been Owner's requirements since the 2008 Settlement took effect and County <br /> has no evidence to show that Owner has breached that responsibility. <br /> Second, County unlawfully and erroneously alleges that the Owner has breached its <br /> responsibility to engage in farm activity while living in Unit B. Unit B is and has only ever been <br /> lived in by "individuals involved in the agricultural or farm related activity." Owner (Bruce <br /> Bergey), who lives in Unit B, has extensively engaged in farm activity on the Property for over <br /> 25-years. Owner has hand planted over 1,000 trees on the Property and to this day waters,prunes, <br /> harvests, and plants crops throughout the year. <br /> An additional room in Unit B is also inhabited by Andrew Bergey, the onsite manager of <br /> the Property. Andrew assists Owner with the Property's agricultural activity and is charged with <br /> maintaining the agricultural operations on the Property when Owner is on and off the island. Thus, <br /> while the Owner does spend some time off island, that does not bar him from inhabiting Unit B <br /> when he is in the State. As long as an occupant involves him or herself in the agricultural process <br /> while on the Property, they are not restricted from living in Unit B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.