My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-09-11 Proof of Service to the Director
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2025-000125 Kona Plantation LLC
>
2025-09-11 Proof of Service to the Director
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2025 8:00:10 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 7:59:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hawai i lawyer.com® <br /> DAMON KEY LEONG KUPCHAK HASTERT <br /> A LAW CORPORATION <br /> Kona Plantation, LLC <br /> September 11, 2025 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 2008-128262 and 2008-128263 respectively. After which Company was the fee simple owner of <br /> the Property. Bruce Bergey is the majority interest holder and member of the Company. Bruce's <br /> son Matthew, and Bruce's grandson Andrew Bergey ("Andrew") are also members of the <br /> Company. <br /> For twenty-six years, Owner managed and operated the Property without interruption under <br /> the dictate of the 2008 Settlement. It was only in 2024 that issues once again started to arise. <br /> Specifically on October 14,2024,the Planning Department sent out a"Courtesy Letter"indicating <br /> that a complaint had been received about the Property's operations and that a Planning Inspector <br /> would be conducting a site inspection. On June 17, 2025, such site inspection was conducted by <br /> Planning Inspector Tiffany Clark("Inspector"). <br /> During the site inspection Owner, when discussing website listings for the Property, <br /> mentioned to the Inspector that a platform had previously reached out to list the Property, but the <br /> Owner had since decided to remove such listing. Owner was not referring to the "Ohana Retreat" <br /> website as alleged in the NOVO. <br /> The Inspector also erroneously concluded that all sixteen bedrooms on the Property <br /> constituted as"dwelling units"upon the Property, despite the fact that key elements of establishing <br /> a "dwelling unit" under the Hawaii County Code were absent from said bedrooms. Specifically, <br /> heating elements are not and should not be present in any of the sixteen bedrooms. <br /> Finally, the inspector alleged that the "host currently resides in the additional farm <br /> dwelling" but does not "actively engage[] in agricultural operations on the property." This is <br /> simply false. The Property is used and operated for farm activities. Specifically, 200 trees are <br /> maintained on the Property including both cacao and coffee trees. Both the cacao and coffee that <br /> are grown on the Property are processed into consumables (chocolate and Kona coffee) on the <br /> Property grounds. Bruce actively farms the Property to this day despite some health complications, <br /> and continues to plant, water, and prune the farm's trees. Andrew assists his grandfather in the <br /> year-round management and operation of the farm. Thus,Bruce and Andrew both qualify to reside <br /> in Unit B of the Property. <br /> It is unclear why the County has changed its position after almost seventeen years of <br /> uninterrupted operations on the Property, but it is clear that the Planning Department's NOVO is <br /> completely contrary to the Parties 2008 Settlement and is based on erroneous findings of fact and <br /> conclusions of law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.