My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-02-10 I'o Processing Company - BOA General Petition for Appeal 4870-8058-9647 v.4
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2023-000065 I'O PROCESSING (DPW)
>
2023-02-10 I'o Processing Company - BOA General Petition for Appeal 4870-8058-9647 v.4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2023 9:25:14 AM
Creation date
2/13/2023 9:25:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
("Deputy Chief') for the County Department of Public Works ("DPW"), dated January 13, <br /> 2023, denying the approval of Declarations of Compliance for agricultural buildings pursuant to <br /> HRS § 46-88, and requiring the processing of building permit(s)per Hawaii County Code <br /> ("HCC") Section 5-1-5 (the "Denial"). See Ex. 1. <br /> I. INTRODUCTION. <br /> The DPW's Denial erroneously denied six separate Declarations of Agricultural <br /> Compliance (together, the"Declaration") and concluded that Appellant's agricultural structures <br /> must be processed through the traditional building permit process in Hawaii County Code <br /> Chapter 5 ("County Building Code"), instead of through the expedited approvals and <br /> exemptions set forth in HRS § 46-88. See Ex. 2. In fact, Appellant's agricultural structures, <br /> which are vital to the State of Hawai`i's and County's goals of sustainable agriculture and food <br /> production, should have been considered and approved under HRS § 46-88. DPW's denial was <br /> in violation of law,was clearly erroneous, and was an abuse of discretion. <br /> II. PARTIES AND AFFECTED PROPERTY. <br /> The real property in question is located in Makaula,North Kona on TMK: <br /> (3) 7-3,002:015, a parcel of approximately 21.936 acres located within the SLU Agricultural <br /> District and zoned Agricultural A-20a(the "Property"). The Property is owned by Nichole <br /> Roselani Kiyoko Kanda and John Totah,who have consented to this appeal. Appellant is <br /> licensee of an approximately 4.0-acre portion of the Property and owns and operates the <br /> agricultural structures thereon. <br /> III. BACKGROUND FACTS -APPELLANT IS SEEKING PERMITTING FOR AN <br /> AGRICULTURAL UNIT TO MEET HAWAI'I'S NEEDS. <br /> Appellant is a small, locally-owned meat processing company which was established in <br /> an effort to support Hawaii's network of local farmers and ranchers in the meat industry and to <br /> develop a better sustainable future in agriculture. At present,many local farmers and ranchers <br /> are forced to ship their livestock to the mainland for processing -- even if the meat is intended for <br /> local consumers. This is obviously expensive, inconvenient and environmentally wasteful. The <br /> lack of local meat processing options in the State of Hawaii is a major impediment to <br /> sustainable food production in Hawaii. <br /> To address the pressing need of local farmers and ranchers, Appellant has established a <br /> small, enclosed agricultural facility for the local processing of livestock on approximately 4- <br /> 2 <br /> 4870-8058-9647.4.071717-00001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.