My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-28 DPW Response to Appellants Subpoenas
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2023-000065 I'O PROCESSING (DPW)
>
2024-10-28 DPW Response to Appellants Subpoenas
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2024 8:05:52 AM
Creation date
10/29/2024 8:04:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
When the Court said that"[a] contested case hearing affords parties extensive procedural <br /> protections similar to those afforded parties in a civil bench trial before a judge," it was referring <br /> to the Board of Land and Natural Resources' ["BLNR"] rules related to contested case hearings. <br /> Id., ("These protections include the opportunity to issue subpoenas for witnesses to testify under <br /> oath or produce documents, to cross-examine witnesses under oath, and to present evidence by <br /> submitting documents and testimony under oath in support of their positions. See HAR §§ 13-1- <br /> 32(c), (g); 13-1-33(a), (b); 13-1-35"). <br /> The Court was not saying that the HRCP should apply to contested cases. The Court was <br /> describing the BLNR's contested case rules, including the following, which mimic the BOA's <br /> rules: HAR § 13-1-32(c) states that the presiding officer has the power to "compel attendance of <br /> witnesses and the production of documentary evidence . . ." HAR § 13-1-32(g) states that each <br /> party "shall have the right to conduct such cross-examinations of witnesses as may be required to <br /> a full and true disclosure of the relevant facts and shall have the right to submit rebuttal evidence <br /> . . ." HAR §13-1-33(a) states that parties can request subpoenas for witnesses or documents; <br /> however, the requestor must specify why the testimony is "material and relevant to the issues <br /> involved" and why the "particular document or record, or part thereof' is "material and relevant <br /> to the issues involved." <br /> IL FIRS § 46-88 Agricultural buildings and structures; exemptions from <br /> building and building code requirements. <br /> In 2012, HRS § 46-88 was enacted and the purpose was: <br /> SECTION 1. The legislature finds that existing building codes and permitting <br /> processes are overly burdensome to the State's commercial agriculture and <br /> aquaculture industries and add substantial time and costs to establishing or <br /> expanding farming and ranching enterprises in the State. <br /> The purpose of this Act is to encourage and support diversified agriculture and <br /> agricultural self-sufficiency in the State by providing an exemption from building <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.