Laserfiche WebLink
of the Director's jurisdiction and discretion"; Board Member McNamarra seconded. No <br /> discussion occurred. An all-in favor vote was taken, and the motion passed unanimously. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 31:25] Chair Lewis motioned to amend the conclusions of law <br /> to add a new number seven (7) which would state, "The order sufficiently addressed the <br /> questions raised by the appellant, even though the order did not reflect the specifics desired by <br /> the appellant"; Board Member Martin seconded. No discussion occurred. An all-in favor vote <br /> was taken, and the motion passed unanimously. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 32:33] Chair Lewis motioned to amend the conclusions of law <br /> to add a new number eight (8) which would state, "Appellant's argued lack of clarity and/or <br /> specifics in the Director's responses, but that did not meet the burden required for modifying <br /> or remanding the Planning Director's decision"; Vice Chair Saiki seconded. No discussion <br /> occurred. An all-in favor vote was taken, and the motion passed unanimously. Ms. Wan <br /> mentioned for clarity, the original number five (5)would become number nine (9). <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 34:00] Chair Lewis motioned to amend the decision and order <br /> in the very last paragraph of the document, to cross out denied and replace with affirmed. It <br /> would then state, "The Planning Director's April 29th, 2024, Zendo Kern, Planning Director, <br /> County of Hawai`i's declaratory order in the matter of C & J Coupe Family Limited <br /> Partnership, petitioner docket number 24-0001 is affirmed", then the last sentence remains <br /> unchanged; Board Member McNamarra seconded. No discussion occurred. An all-in favor <br /> vote was taken, and the motion passed unanimously. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 36:32] Chair Lewis motioned to amend the conclusions of law, <br /> the old number five (5), which is now number nine (9)to change the word ruled to concluded; <br /> and to change the word denied to affirmed. It would then state, "Having considered the <br /> testimony and evidence provided, the Board unanimously concluded that in issuing his Order, <br /> the Planning Director Zendo Kern did not clearly err, was not arbitrary or capricious, nor did <br /> he abuse his discretion. Therefore, the Board affirmed Zendo Kern", then the rest remains <br /> unchanged; Board Member McNamarra seconded. No discussion occurred. An all-in favor <br /> vote was taken, and the motion passed unanimously. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 39:43] Chair Lewis motioned to approve the proposed findings <br /> of fact, conclusions of law, as amended by the subsequent amended motions. No discussion <br /> occurred. A roll-call vote was taken, and the motion passed with four ayes (Martin, Saiki, <br /> McNamarra, Lewis). <br /> This item concluded at 10:09 a.m. <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> Minutes of December 13, 2024 <br /> 3 <br />