Laserfiche WebLink
[SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:53:04] No discussion on the main motion as amended <br /> occurred. A roll-call vote was taken, and the motion passed with four ayes (Martin, <br /> McNamarra, Saiki, Lewis). <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:54:54] Chair Lewis asked Mr. Salas-Ferguson to prepare the <br /> order and file it with the Board by December 27t1i 2024, and the appellant can file any <br /> objections by January 3rd, 2025. <br /> This item concluded at 11:24 a.m. <br /> MINUTES <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:56:12] A motion was made by Board Member Martin to approve <br /> the hearing minutes of October 11th, 2024, as circulated. The motion was seconded by Board <br /> Member McNamarra. A brief discussion occurred. Chair Lewis mentioned a typo on page two (2) <br /> where it states was not clearly erroneous, was not an abusive discretion, to be replaced by abuse <br /> of discretion. Board Member Martin motioned to make the change as noted by the Chair; Board <br /> Member McNamarra seconded. An all-in favor vote was taken, and the motion passed <br /> unanimously. The motion to amend was adopted. The motion on the floor to adopt the minutes as <br /> amended was seconded by Board Member McNamarra. No discussion occurred. An all-in favor <br /> vote was taken, and the motion passed unanimously. <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br /> Status of appeals filed on Board of Appeals decisions — Corporation Counsel <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:58:58] Ms. Wan reported on the Board of Appeals decisions, <br /> there were three notable decisions that reached their final judgment. The first one was Lawrence <br /> Ford, John Koontz,Peter Hazard Trust,Don Davis,John Legerfo,Phillip Koszarek,William Gage, <br /> and Rebecca Gage in matter 3CCV-23-0000200. The final judgment was entered on December <br /> 2nd 2024, which reversed the Board of Appeals decision allowing a short-term vacation rental <br /> (STVR) on agricultural property. The reason for that judgment is the Supreme Court case, Linda <br /> Rosehill and other parties versus the State of Hawai`i Land Use Commission (LUC) and the <br /> County of Hawai`i filed on September 24th, 2024, found that STVR's are not allowed on <br /> agricultural land. <br /> The Ford case (PL-BOA-2022-00020) and Gage case (PL-BOA-2022-000021) will return on <br /> the agenda. The Rosehill consolidated cases, which includes sixteen(16) cases also will return <br /> on the agenda. The last matter was Claudia Rohr versus the Board of Appeals and Planning <br /> Department in 3CCV-23-0000100, the Judge had entered a findings of fact, conclusions of <br /> law, decision and order affirming the Board's decision. The final judgment was entered on <br /> November 15th, 2024. Ms. Rohr has a different case pending before the Board that stayed <br /> pending the outcome of this particular case, however it may return to the Board's agenda. <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> Minutes of December 13, 2024 <br /> 7 <br />