Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DCC Campbell responds that no, the commission does not have the authority to remove a <br />property from the list and certainly not once it has a resolution. However, the commission can <br />make a suggestion to Council. DCC Campbell agrees that the commission is describing two <br />processes, one to contemplate the removal process and one to evaluate the list and see what is <br />actually there. She then offers the commission some historical reference that in 2023 the <br />commission contemplated disallowing resubmissions for properties that were already on the list <br />and it was decided against. DCC Campbell continues to say that the commission can reconsider <br />their rules again and suggests that it might also be time to contemplate a lot of the processes <br />within the rules and that she would be happy to give more training on what the process is. DCC <br />Campbell then mentions that along with the past administration, the Council has also discussed <br />their desire to see the list reprioritized. <br /> <br />Chr. Chang states that looking at the entire list and evaluating it is a large undertaking especially <br />with being on the verge of thinking about the stewardship grant process. However, she does not <br />like the idea of doing nothing and allowing a decision from Council be imposed upon the <br />commission. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br />Cmr. Markoff moved to establish a PInG to re-prioritize or re-evaluate the Prioritized List and form <br />a second PInG for the other portion that someone else can put forward a motion for. Seconded by <br />Cmr. Rosam. <br /> <br />Chr. Chang opened the floor for discussion. <br /> <br />Secretary Braman asked Cmr. Markoff to clarify the motion. <br /> <br />Cmr. Markoff restated his motion and a discussion ensued amongst the commissioners. Cmr. <br />Markoff then withdrew his motion. <br /> <br />V. Chr. Britt moved to establish a PInG to look at the properties with a resolution and evaluate <br />what their current status is. Seconded by Cmr. Lawson. <br /> <br />After asking if there were any further discussion and hearing none, Chr. Chang called for the roll <br />call vote. <br /> <br />VOTE: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Brandt, Markoff, Rosam, Lawson, V. Chr. Britt, Chr. Chang <br />Noes: None. <br /> <br />Established PInG: V. Chr. Britt, Cmr. Markoff, Cmr. Lawson, Chr. Chang <br /> <br />V. COMMISSIONER REPORT – PONC IN PRACTICE – A POLICY SUMMIT: <br />1. Pursuant to HRS § 92-2.5(e), Commissioners who have attended the PONC in Practice – A <br />Policy Summit, follow-up meeting on March 20, 2026, are to report their attendance and the <br />matters presented and discussed that relate to official commission business. <br /> <br />Deborah Ward - Testifies in regards to the PONC summit and also testifies regarding the previous <br />agenda item and offers that it is possible for a non-commissioner to be a member of a PInG. <br />DRAFT v.1 - Minutes of May 11, 2026 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br /> <br />