My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-06-19 Motion to Dismiss (PL-BOA-2026-000133 ROHR).pdf
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Future Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2026-000133 Claudia Rohr (PD)
>
2026-06-19 Motion to Dismiss (PL-BOA-2026-000133 ROHR).pdf
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2026 11:12:59 AM
Creation date
6/25/2026 11:12:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
6/19/2026
Permit Number
PL-BOA-2026-000133
Description
2026-06-19 Motion to Dismiss (PL-BOA-2026-000133 ROHR).pdf
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. Appellant Has Alleged No Actual Injury <br />While participating in this appeal pro se, Appellant is an experienced appellant at the <br />Board of Appeals having filed nine appeals over the last eight years'. Appellant is well aware of <br />the BOA Rules and their requirements. Appellant has failed to meet the burden imposed by BOA <br />Rule 8-2. The Petition contains no factual allegations of injury to Appellant, the general public, <br />or the environment. Appellant provides nothing more than a simple statement that her "interests <br />have been injured" without articulating any factual evidence of injury or any connection to the <br />issuance of the SMA Minor Permit. See Petition at Page 2. <br />The filming activity authorized by this SMA Minor Permit was "conducting a one -day <br />video shoot featuring two cast members speaking on the beach and brief filmed interactions at <br />the top of the Papa ikou Camp property. No structures will be built and no permanent lighting or <br />installations will be used." Special Management Area Minor Permit No. PL-SMM-2026-000085. <br />Not only has Appellant failed to describe a specific injury to herself that is clearly <br />distinguishable from that of the general public, she has failed to articulate any actual or imminent <br />injury at all. Appellant resides nearly 10 miles from the filming location, alleges no facts <br />supporting any unique use of the location that she might make and does not even allege that her <br />potential use of the location would be affected in any way by the SMA Minor Permit, which <br />required that the beach area remain open to the public throughout the duration of the filming. In <br />fact, neither Appellant or any other member of the public was denied access to the public beach <br />during the set up or the filming activities. Even if the Board were to accept that injury might <br />occur, Appellant's injury would not be distinguishable from that of the general public. <br />' Appellant is the initiator of BOA 18-000190, BOA 18-000200, BOA 19-000210, PL-BOA-2022-000025, PL- <br />BOA-2022-000057, PL-BOA-2023-000075, PL-BOA-0205-000119, PL-BOA-2025-000121, and PL-BOA-2026- <br />000133. <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.