Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Merit Appeals Board April 23, 2026 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />New Business (Item 7) <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: There is no “New Business.” <br /> <br />Unfinished Business (Item 8) <br /> <br />FY 2025-2026 Annual Performance Evaluation Of The Director Of Human Resources (HR) <br />Process; And FY 2025-2026 Human Resources Employee Survey: Proposed Timeline To <br />Distribute Surveys And Deadline For Responses; SurveyMonkey Questions For <br /> FY 2025-2026 (Line Department Survey); SurveyMonkey Questions For FY 2025-2026 <br />(Employee Survey); Merit Appeals Board’s Evaluation Tool For The Director Of HR For <br />FY 2025-2026; Define Target Audience/Survey Participants. Executive Session: The <br />Merit Appeals Board Anticipates Convening One Or More Executive Meetings Regarding <br />The Above Matter, Pursuant To HRS Sections 92-4, 92-5(a)(2) And 92-5(a)(4), To Consider <br />The Hire, Evaluation, Dismissal, Or Discipline Of An Officer Or Employee Of The County <br />Of Hawaiʻi, Where Considerations Of Matters Affecting Privacy Will Be Involved And <br />Consulting With The Board’s Attorney On Questions And Issues Pertaining To The <br />Board’s Powers, Duties, Privileges, Immunities, And Liabilities. A 2/3 Vote Of The <br />Members Present Pursuant To HRS Section 92-4 Is Necessary To Hold An Executive <br />Meeting <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: We are now on “Unfinished Business.” The discussion of the Annual <br />Performance Evaluation for Fiscal 2025 to 2026 is in an open session. And in a separate folder <br />that Glynis provided us, we have—it’s in the brown folder and it’s all of the documents that we <br />used last year—for Gilbert, this is going to be your first round or rodeo to help or to evaluate the <br />Director. And this is done in accordance with Hawaiʻi state law that the Director is evaluated <br />every June. So, this is in preparation for that evaluation. <br /> <br />The first draft in the folder, the white sheet—Glynis is giving Sommer her folder. So, Sommer, <br />this is the timeline that we usually follow for the Performance Evaluation process—starting in <br />April, which is this month, reviewing the survey questionnaires and/or evaluation forms that <br />we’ve used in the past. <br /> <br />We have tweaked them recently. There’s also a draft cover letter that, as the Chair, Glynis <br />sends out in an email to accompany the survey, and we define who will receive the surveys. <br />And then, in May, the surveys are emailed to the line departments and HR employees, <br />whomever we decide the target group will be, with deadline for response—no later than the end <br />of the month, which is May 29. <br /> <br />So, Glynis has already established the timeline for our review. She sends it out with the <br />th <br />deadline for them to respond—May 29. And proposed email distribution date will be May 21— <br />so we would give them a little over a week to complete the survey forms. <br /> <br />Come June, Glynis extracts the survey results. In the past, Recruitment and Examination <br />Division Manager would extract the NeoGov applicant survey results and forward them to <br />Glynis. I think we decided last year that it really didn’t have much significance for us to continue <br />that, but it’s up to us, if we want to or not. <br /> <br />Page 19 <br /> <br /> <br />