2026-6-26 APPELLANTS OBJECTIONS TO PROPOSED ORDER_v1.pdf

Home

hydrant on the corner of Oeoe Street and Kalanianaole Street. [page 1, #2.] CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 20. Standing is a procedural threshold that Restrictive interpretations of standing must be satisfied before the Board may requirements imposed by an agency are not consider the merits of any case. See Public entitled to deference and may be reviewed Access Shoreline Hawaii by Rothstein v. de novo on appeal. See Public Access Hawaii Cnty. Planning Comm'n by Shoreline Hawaii v. Hawai'i Cty. Plan. Comm'n, 79 Hawai'i 425, 434, 903 P.2d Fujimoto, 79 Hawai'i 425, 431, 903 P.2d 1246, 1252 (1995) (noting "claimant had to 1246, 1255 (1995) (PASH). have standing to appeal" in order for court to have jurisdiction to decide issues presented). 21. Board of Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedures, Rule 8-2 requires that: Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the Director regarding matters within their jurisdiction, including the administration or application of the County Codes under their authority may appeal the decision to the Board. A person is aggrieved by a decision of the Director if: (1) the person has an interest in the subject matter of the decision and is so directly and immediately affected, that the person's interest is clearly distinguishable from that of the general public; and (2) The person is or will be adversely affected by the decision. 22. The Director's determination was made Rohr objects on the grounds that pursuant to the SMA criteria set forth in Conclusions of law #22 simply contradicts Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 205A, the Second Amended Petition allegations: which focuses on protecting shoreline environmental resources and ensuring By failing to address and enforce the Landowners' violations of the zoning code 15