My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-22 Arborist Advisory Committee Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Arborist Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2008
>
2005-09-22 Arborist Advisory Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2011 2:11:35 PM
Creation date
6/20/2011 2:11:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Bisel stated that as far as Exceptional Trees go, we should look at the idea of <br />paying closer attention to the healthof our trees and if theyre not, then its our kuleana to <br />identify them. <br />Corp. Counsel Noda stated that mapping of all the Exceptional Trees and filing the map <br />with Planning and Public Works, Building and the County Clerk should be a primary <br />goal because thats actually a County Code requirement for the Committee. <br />Chair Bisel will check with Roy Takemoto on the status of the mapping. <br />6.Procedure to remove a tree from the list of Exceptional Trees of the County of Hawaii: <br />Chair Bisel stated that since the Quinine Tree is no longer there, we need to look at <br />removing it from the list. Also, we were asked to comment on the removal of one of the <br />trees from the Mango Grove in Pohoiki thats in conjunction with the new bypass road <br />proposed for that area. <br />R. Siracusa was concerned about the removal of that one tree and about not setting a <br />precedent for the removal of other healthy, Exceptional Trees. She was concerned about <br />the legal wording that goes with it and wanted to include this shall not act as a <br />precedent. Since the Ordinance does allow for removal of trees that are diseased or <br />damaged and pose a threat to the public, she wanted it to be explicit and possibly word <br />the removal recommendation in such a way that it especially refers to the public safety <br />issue - that its being removed in order to create a safe intersection for the general public <br />and that it should not be taken as a precedent for the removal of other Exceptional Trees. <br />Corp. Counsel Noda will prepare the draft to remove the Quinine Tree and have Parks & <br />Recreation Director Engelhard and Chair Bisel review it. <br />In reference to the Pohoiki mango tree, Chair Bisel announced that he was involved in the <br />parkprojectthatsassociatedwiththenewbypassroadsohewasthinkingofnot <br />participating in the vote or the recommendation. Corp. Counsel Noda suggested that he <br />recuse himself. <br />An Environmental Assessment for the by-pass road was submitted by Ron Terry and E. <br />Imamura had forwarded it to M. Kraus to review and prepare a recommendation on <br />behalf of the Committee. <br />M. Kraus stated that he knows the tree and the Grove really well. He noted that most <br />likely some other trees have been removed for driveways by people who didnt know <br />they were Exceptional Trees or werent notified of the Groves status by the subdivider. <br />The removal of this tree makes sense from the point of a safe intersection. It makes sense <br />from the point of view that a lot of boats are going to be coming from Four Corners and <br />are going to have to make that corner down there. If we did an island with the tree in the <br />center of two lanes, that would probably kill the tree anyway. It would lose too much of <br />its root system. The cutting of that road would not impact the other mangoes <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.