My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-10 Committee on the Status of Women Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Prosecuting Attorney
>
Committee on the Status of Women
>
Minutes
>
Minutes Archive
>
2010
>
2010-09-10 Committee on the Status of Women Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 10:07:35 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 10:07:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K. Nova offered to draft a news release announcing the essay contest to gain more <br />visibility. <br />C. Hawaii County WomenÓs Hall of Fame Î Committee <br />CSW reviewed the program. <br />N. Kelly raised a concern about repeat nominations and suggested that CSW <br />consider that in the future. J. Mecklenburg endorsed this idea and felt that there <br />should be some kind of stamp of approval like a screening where these are the <br />women who the committee feel are worthy of being nominated or honored as a <br />nominee. K. Peters said that she didnÓt think that CSW should have a set number of <br />winners. The ratio would never be less than 50 percent and there <br />just one person left out. Secondly, she stated that graciousness and humility is part <br />of being a role model. She disagrees and people that she spoke to really disagree <br />about Ðfeeling embarrassed or not wanting to come.Ñ <br />J. Viernes shared feedback that her friend from Waimea nominated a woman from <br />Kona and her friend indicated that win or lose; they are still coming to the event. <br />J. Mecklenburg said that she sees the point of inviting people from off island if the <br />nominee is inducted permanently into the hall of fame. However, K. Peters said that <br />the guests have a lot of ideas and one is about entertaining being a draw. <br />Entertainment has never been a draw and the reason why people co <br />women. <br />N. Kelly suggested that CSW possibly consider inviting all the nominees, but also <br />announce the winners. K. Peters responded that CSW may be stuck with some of <br />the nominees and the problem with six winners and two nominees. There will be <br />some nominees who will not attend if they are not a winner. <br />D. Pung said that one way to make this manageable is that CSW has criteria as to <br />who becomes a finalist because the committee will not be able to afford 40 people. <br />K. Peters felt CSW shouldnÓt have the criteria written in stone so the committee has <br />the flexibility to make changes. <br />K. Peters offered to purchase 12 leis for the nominees at Costco. N. Kelly will create <br />a certificate for the nominees. <br />K. Nova asked how the committee will address the issue about the invitations. <br />J. Mecklenburg responded that CSW is prohibited from giving the guests any special <br />treatment. The issue is whether in the invitations or information that is being <br />distributed if the committee is going to disclose the winners or disclose the winners <br />to the nominating party/people. K. Nova said her personal opinion is that we honor <br />them all and see what happens. CSW agreed. <br />D. Pung offered to draft the invitation to the nominee and nominator. K. Nova will <br />draft a press release announcing the finalists. <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.