Laserfiche WebLink
funding through that Act. That’s just an example of some of the things that we don’t see <br />by just looking at the committees. But I think this is something that people on the <br />committees, or people who oversee the committees would be able to tell us if that’s the <br />direction that we go to. <br />MS. WONG: <br />And that larger question of, is any of this doable? Some are by Charter, <br />this is by Charter. I had responded that we’re advisory. Some of the other things that <br />we may be recommending outside of this topic may or may not be doable, especially <br />things dealing with the union and salary. So we come up with the thought and a <br />recommendation and take it from there. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />It’s good to get feedback. <br />MS. WONG: <br />So, maybe with that comment it would be better to ask them to appear, <br />either or. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />The other thing is people on the Fire Commission aren’t necessarily <br />going to know what the Board of Appeals does. So, how do you want them to comment <br />on whether or not it makes sense for them consolidate with somebody else? Are we <br />giving them that information? What is it that you’re going to be asking them? <br />MS. WONG: <br />I would think they would communicate with the department that assists <br />them to help them understand to come to an answer. Kathy, is it naïve of me to think <br />that? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />I’m actually just trying to think of how your letter is going to look. And <br />at this point if you say to the chair of the Board of Appeals, what do you think about <br />consolidating with the Fire Commission? I really would assume they might go, I don’t <br />know. There’ll have to some explanation of what the Fire Commission does and their <br />duties. I’m wondering what kind of <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Either that or why they might think that they might be a logical fit so <br />they would have something to react too. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Maybe. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Which would be a lot more work on our part. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />So, from the standpoint of cost, it’s to shrink the commissions so that <br />you don’t have the cost of operating the commission or paying for mileage? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Yes. And we actually did get some comments from Energy people <br />saying that their board or commission should not meet as often, didn’t we? Or maybe <br />that was the last Cost of Government Commission. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />I remember that. I don’t remember in this one. Yeah, it was in <br />the last one. <br />10 <br /> <br />