My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:06:55 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I’m ready to do it for a few of these at least is to ask the Planning <br />director to come and specifically have this discussion with her with all of us saying, what <br />is the difference between an Action Committee and a Steering Committee or a Planning <br />Committee? What is the role? And get from her first some recommendations on <br />combinations. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />If I read this right, the Steering Committees are already eliminated <br />aren’t they? It says their terms ends on 12/31 already. <br />MS. WONG: <br />But I think systematically as steering committees are needed, there is <br />steering and action committees. I don’t remember, I may be confused about when <br />Bobby Jean spoke about this, but did she not address that specific topic here or am I <br />thinking about the time we met with her in individually. Did she not speak about that <br />here? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I don’t recall that. I think it was probably you talking to her about it. <br /> <br />I could be wrong but I think you reported back that she had mentioned it. Well, I’m open <br /> <br />to suggestions on how we want to move forward with this. <br /> <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />It seems like more appropriately it would be the departments that <br />oversee the different committees, if you want feedback on whether the combinations <br />would work. Normally there’s an agency that provides oversight or that these <br />committees are assigned to. Maybe if you want feedback, the appropriate feedback, <br />maybe the departments could make those comments that you’re looking for rather than <br />the members. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />The departments would actually save the money by combining or <br />eliminating some of these committees. And then the department head would choose <br />whether talk to the committee about it? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />I think if you’re suggesting that like Aging and Disabilities combine, then <br />Office of Aging is responsible for, right now anyway, Office of Aging is responsible for <br />the Committee on Aging and Committee on People with Disabilities. So, they may want <br />to provide feedback on whether it’s feasible to do that combination. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So we would send a letter to each department saying for all of <br />those committees, advisory or whatever committees you have under your <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />Like Ag, is that R&D? It’s got to be R&D. <br />MS. WONG: <br />HR. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />No, not HR. If anything, it is R&D. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />And Arborist would be Parks? <br />MS. WONG: <br />That’s what they told me. <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.