Laserfiche WebLink
improvement in morale. I’m not quite certain how that works but the idea of a <br />consolidation of functions across the county may also be something to think about. I <br />just wanted to mention that before I lost that train of thought again. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Thank you. I have some specific questions for you. You had brought up <br />property tax. Of course it’s never the case that as an elected official you want to raise <br />property taxes. But we have some situations that leave us with glaring holes in terms of <br />collections. One is the homeowner exemption and how it is applied. As you are aware <br />the Real Property Tax Office applies homeowner exemption to unpermitted structures. <br />Changing that could make a great deal of difference in tax collections. And in fact, we <br />might even be able to lower our tax rates if we were to move in that direction. Another <br />is the use of ag exemptions and how they are documented. We aren’t requesting any <br />financial information to show that people who are taking ag exemptions are actually <br />earning some money from their agricultural endeavors or subsistence farming. We’re <br />taking no financial information. So these are some things that we are looking at in <br />terms of suggestions, and I’m curious to know, as a legislator, how you would respond <br />to making those types of changes. <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Well, specifically, to the two areas that you mentioned, and then I’ll <br />respond on a much broader basis. The idea of going back to unpermitted buildings and <br />things like that, we should do a much better job at tightening up on that. And I see no <br />reason that we shouldn’t pursue that. I don’t know how much. Somebody used to tell <br />me, is it worth the strain and the effort in order to see those changes made, and how <br />much you think we will estimate to receive as a result of that. The ag issue is one that’s <br />froth with all types problems. What we need to do in agriculture is a crime. I don’t <br />mean that quite like that. We have a potential for an industry here on this island that we <br />haven’t even begun to tap. I’ve got farmers in my district, Kohala and Waimea, who are <br />very willing to expand the amount of land that they have in production but they are not <br />ready to try to do any of that at the moment because of the cost of making that happen <br />and the inability to establish or secure even to hold them, a good market somewhere on <br />this island for their products. There’s a whole number of things regarding this. I’m less <br />supportive of changes in the agricultural situation until we go back to the one important <br />question that’s been pending in this state for the last 34 years, and that’s the resolution <br />of the important ag land issues. Since the 1978 State constitution, we’ve had the <br />authority and the mandate to do this. And we as well as other counties have set on our <br />thumbs and not done this. Let me also go back, I think, to the heart of the problem. <br />We’ve come up with an ag plan about a year ago and we’re just, and an ag advisory <br />commission which is there. By the way our office did that so I’m a little bit familiar with <br />some of that aspect. We need to move along on this. We still have only one person in <br />the county government for the past 30 years, 28 years, I’ve forgotten how long DayDay <br />has been around, doing agricultural issues. We can’t support an expansion of this most <br />critical area with just one person. It’s impossible. We need a group of people to do that <br />job. The Agricultural Advisory Commission is just one. We could expand expedientially <br />I think, our revenues as well as our tax base. And we haven’t. We would be well along <br />the way for food self-sufficiency. I’ve often made the comment, we can be food <br />self-sufficient in my lifetime. I believe that folks. I believe that. We have some good <br />ideas. The administration has some good ideas. We aren’t going to get it done with <br />only one person or with an advisory commission. We need a hell of a lot more <br />legislation. And finally, you’re right. Tinkering with the property tax rates, particularly in <br />10 <br /> <br />