My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-14 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-14 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:07:27 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:07:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Well, I must spend a couple of hours a week with residents in my <br />district with the same complaint. The mayor did two years ago, promise that he was <br />going to take a look at that issue. And I think more recently, if I’m not mistaken, there <br />havebeen some efforts being taken within the Department of Public Works to address <br />that concern particularly. I think there’s been some effort to at least try to make that <br />happen. It’s always been a shortfall here. I’m not certain why it doesn’t go down from <br />the Mayor through the Department of Public Works and say fix the darn thing. And I’ll <br />give you 90 days to do it. That’s easier said than done. But I’m of the opinion that <br />some effort is being spent at this time trying to address that long-standing issue. And <br />yes, I will tell you at least for some residents in my district, it continues to be a problem. <br />You’re correct, I do think it would assist. I do think that it would certainly accelerate the <br />process and make it more user friendly. And you would wonder why at a time when we <br />have obviously less building permits than we did say back in 2005 and ‘06,why the <br />process doesn’t accelerate itself. On the other hand, I’m not quite certain that it might <br />be a problem of not having enough educated or committed people working in the <br />department too. And would one or two more people help that process? Or if you put <br />one or two more people there, are we then generating exactly the thing we’re trying to <br />cut down on inflation in staff and so on. Do we have a trade off here? I leave that to <br />you. I haven’t looked at the particulars. I’m under the impression as I say that the <br />mayor is taking some action on this point. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />It might also cut down on the unpermitted building that goes on. <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Next question sir. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />That’s all I have. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Any other questions? <br />MS. WONG: <br />I do. First I’d like to thank you for coming to the meeting. I think it’s a <br />statement for a councilman to come in response to our letter. I appreciate that. And I <br />appreciate that you narrowed your points down to two. It makes it simple. I also <br />appreciate, Eileen did such a good job of summarizing where we are. Wow, aren’t we <br />good when she summarizes. <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Until she said that though, Ms. Wong, I didn’t know where you were. <br />Your letter didn’t exactly say except to provide us the questions, where you happen to <br />be of course at this time, or what your direction and purpose was to be. We haven’t <br />heard too much from the Cost of Government Commission in the past, so this is say, a <br />statement I think by all of you, that you’re willing to be much more involved and <br />participate in this problem and this issue which we feel very keenly each time we get <br />beaten up by either the administration or our own constituents. So, we salute you for <br />trying to take the initiative. <br />MS. WONG: <br />Thank you. And that’s one of our concerns that we want to make sure <br />that people know what we’re about so that they can respond and we can do our job. My <br />committee that I sit on is the Operations, Budget and Consolidation. We’ve split up into <br />three separate committees. Knowing that, I’d like to ask three questions that are related <br />to that area. I’m intrigued that you comewith suggesting the attitude of -it’s always <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.