My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-14 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-14 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:07:27 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:07:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
right at the moment. I may need more study, or you may need to come back to me and <br />show me the disadvantages and things, and maybe I’ll have a different perspective on <br />it. <br />MS. WONG: <br />Okay. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Can I ask a question? The commission on agriculture is separate than <br />the commission on energy? <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Yes. You have two advisory commissions at the moment. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I just wanted to be clear on that. <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Both of them were set up separately. I sponsored the legislation for <br />both. The Agricultural Commission has been in effect for about a year and they’re <br />working on the plan of a couple of things. They’re there, yes, and it is separate from the <br />Energy Commission. <br />MS. WONG: <br />Another question. Mr. Yagong had sent a query out to the employees, I <br />think it was a couple of years ago. It got a lot of responses <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Last year I think. <br />MS. WONG: <br />What did the council do with that information when the report was shared, <br />if anything? <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Well, I can’t speak for other council members. I looked at it as a <br />very good initial recap, summary of valid ideas from people inside the system and how <br />they would look at changes from within. Not from the public perspective but from the <br />individuals in the government. I was pleased. I thought it was good initiative. I <br />recognized there’s political content and purpose. I mean almost every thing we do, I <br />guess has that. Some of the responses were less than encouraging, or less than what I <br />would want to see. But overall I thought it was a good idea. And if it was done <br />consistently on a regular basis with maybe the survey indicating not just, what the heck <br />do you feel down in the Mail Room for instance, but rather in a previous survey the <br />general comments can be best summarized in three or four areas. What do you think <br />about that now? What changes have been made? Have the council done anything? <br />Have the administration done anything to address your concerns? Have there been <br />some in-house issues? That would be interesting. I might also say we have an <br />independent auditor’s office. We need to use them more than we have. And the origin <br />of the performance based audits, I think was a good initiative. I’m happy to have tried to <br />take that one off in the right direction when I was chair of council. We need to do more <br />of that. <br />MS. WONG: <br />Essentially you’re saying the results of that query, council basically said, <br />oh that’s interesting, and did nothing further than that? Cause it’s a one time <br />information. <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.