Laserfiche WebLink
MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Are there other points from his discussion? <br />MS. WONG: <br />Another point not necessarily that he made but I’d like to pose to the <br />commission. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well, I think we can stick with what he said because that’s our topic <br />that we’re on. <br />MS. WONG: <br />But it’s related to what he said. We talked about he was not really aware <br />of what the commission had been doing. And we have been calling people in to see us <br />so we could collect information from them and have discussion. But towards the end <br />when he was talking for the consideration that before we end, after we get the draft, <br />before we end this commission, that we could call in the department directors and <br />verbally tell them what we’d like to in jest, advise them or recommend to them. And <br />instead of collecting information tell them what we’re advising. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Individually or as one big group? <br />MS. WONG: <br />I think one big group so they can hear what each department is being told, <br />but I’m not real clear on the how, just that I’d like to pose that to the commission to <br />consider maybe for the next meeting or something. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I think we already have an agenda item that talks about how we’re <br />going to proceed. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />It’s item 10, Discussion regarding approach to take to timely <br />accomplish mandate of the cost of government commission. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay, that’s a good point and we need to capture it and maybe we <br />can talk more about it when we get to the agenda item. Anything else from <br />Mr.Hoffmann’s comments? Are we ready to move on to agenda item 8? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />So, Madam Chairman, just so I’m clear. So the items that you listed, in <br />the future you will want that under Discussion regarding items previously recommended <br />to be placed in draft report? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />They are I think items that we just want to carry directly into the <br />draft report. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Okay. <br />CORRESPONDENCE: <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So our process with the Correspondence is we will move to accept <br />and file and therefore have the ability to discuss each one of these individually. And <br />hopefully we can move through this quickly. First one is Comm. 2010-145: Response <br />form Guy Toyama, Energy Advisory Commission. Do we want to move to accept and <br />file? Do I hear a motion? <br />28 <br /> <br />