My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:07:54 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:07:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. O’HARA: <br />And there’s further comments within the document are valid too. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So, should we <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: B <br />Give it a . <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Give this one a B, which is vehicle related. We are now down to <br /> <br />County workers at higher levels have a larger percentage cuts or furloughs. Do we <br /> <br />A <br />want to put this into our category? <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Yes. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Services provide by the county can be more efficiently provided by <br /> <br />private parties on a bid basis. I think that’s the only one that was in this document like <br /> <br />that related to bids. <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: C <br />Let’s just give it a and see if there’s more about outside services. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: C <br />is outside services. On page 2, council members are supposed <br />to agree to the negotiated union contracts, it’s about time for the council to participate in <br />these contracts. What I heard today, council really has no choice in these contracts. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I don’t really follow the meaning of this comment in terms of cost <br />savings. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Shall we toss this one out? <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Yeah. I’d recommend that we toss it aside. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Jobs that have been vacant for one year or more should be <br /> <br />A <br />eliminated. category? Hamakua lands. First of all, is this the kind of thing we want to <br />deal with? If so, is it something that fits into one of our subcommittees? Is it now kind <br />of irrelevant? Or is it relevant to go from the commission? <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />I suggest we pass on this one. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Agree? We toss that one out? <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Yes. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Get away from manning and ramping up county operations based <br /> <br />on best case scenario. Should we toss that one out? <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Yes. <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: A <br />Four day work week. That’s an , I would say. <br /> <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Yes. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.