My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:07:54 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:07:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Operations? <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />I think it’s a Green Committee? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />It could be no particular subcommittee. It could be something we <br />want to discuss as a whole. So what would you like to do with this one? I think there’s <br />another like the same thing in here somewhere. Are we a G? It’s actually energy use. <br />So what do we decide? Is it a G because it’s an energy use and a new category? <br />MR. ARMOUR: G <br />for green. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay. Last one on this page. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />That’s another green. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Either that or this is just sort of what we’re arguing. What would we <br />do with this one? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />It’s more of a comment than a suggestion. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: A <br />So, I think it comes out. The first one on page 5 is an again. The <br />E <br />second one is the Revenue Enhancement committee which is . <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Is this something that is also covered by statute, excessive false fire <br />alarms? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />No,the statute I was thinking of was for the response. There is <br />probably a criminal act on the false alarm and whether or not there is any sort of <br />restitution as part of a criminal complaint, I’m not sure. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />We can always keep it in and then when we do provide our draft to <br />the departments we can find out their response for this. Is that a reasonable way to <br />handle this one? <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />Yeah, I think you also have to find out if there’s even an issue. This <br />person thinks it is, but does Long’s Drug set of their alarm two times a week and the <br />Fire Department will respond or did it happen once? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well, I think we either would need to assign it to a subcommittee to <br />ask the Fire Department or the Police Department if this is an issue at all, or leave it in <br />the draft and let them respond to it when we send the draft out and say this isn’t an <br />issue for us. Or we already do this. So what’s your pleasure on how we want to handle <br />it? Or we drop it. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I’m actually for dropping it. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay. I think this is one of those comments again and not a <br />suggestion. Shall we drop it? <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.