My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:07:54 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:07:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. O’HARA: <br />Yes. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: A <br />Pay cut. That would be . Increase the gasoline tax, but not the <br />E <br />real property tax. That’s an . <br />Okay that’s the easy part. Now, what do we want to do with all of our A’s, which are all <br />personnel related? It kind of goes along, it actually kind of blends into the agenda item, <br />how we’re going to proceed. Because it seems to me we probably ought to pull out the <br />personnel related items, some of which are redundant and could be exactly the same <br />person who made the comment that we got from our employee solicitations and <br />perhaps there’s even some from the department heads. If we’re going to be looking at <br />personnel issues we should do it all in a bundle. How would you like to do it? As a <br />group? I don’t think we need another subcommittee. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />Well we have this suggestion. We have 144 other documents and <br />there’s a lot of same type of suggestions in there. So if you’re going to do something <br />with these, we should include them all together. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Right because ultimately what we want to do is look at all of those <br />suggestions, decide which ones might be viable. Put it in our draft. Send it to HR, or <br />the Police Department, Fire Department, whichever one it’s relevant to, and get their <br />comments back on those suggestions. So, I think we’re going to do it as a group. And <br />then the question is how do we get all of those A category things from everything we’ve <br />gotten so far including this, together in one cohesive whole, that we can go, okay that’s <br />the same as that, that’s the same as that, that doesn’t make any sense. How would you <br />like to go about it? Do you guys have any suggestions? Seems like we need to go <br />through all of those suggestions that we got from the employees again and from the <br />departments again. Should we talk about this now or is it, or is it how we’re how we’re <br />moving forward? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />You still want to inaudible suggestions. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well it’s generated from this, but it’s really how we’re dealing with <br />all suggestions. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I think it would behoove us to look collectively at all A’s and all related <br />comments that we’ve received previously, and formulate that into a couple of <br />paragraphs that describe all the issues that are presented because there are so much <br />commonality between these comments. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />You really could start again like how you have done. Say using a goal, <br />the draft. At the top of my head, there have been at least in here, two or three on four <br />10-hour work days. And that was something that went into the draft report, it inaudible <br />going to the four 10-hour work day. As you’re going through these, then you could say <br />we already put it in there. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay. How about, I’m willing to go through all of that stuff again. <br />And I’m not willing to retype all of this stuff again, but to just sort of summarize the <br />suggestions and then we can talk about all of those various personnel things. So I will <br />31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.