My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-11-17 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-11-17 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:19:47 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:08:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to the island not understanding the community in which they're moving into, suddenly <br />moving into it and then expecting it to change to their way of life. A lot of our <br />communities are farming communities. We have a lot of people that live in a residential <br />area, but they do a lot of farming, and at night time they'll come in and they'll clean their <br />vegetables in their carport. They've been doing this for 15 years. You get a person that <br />comes into the neighborhood, buys a house, looks across and he doesn't like that. This is <br />not an agricultural lot. This is residential. It's supposed to be quiet at night. And so <br />they file a complaint. And then the complaint is bounced against the code. The code says <br />it's residential, you can't be doing that. But they've been doing it for 15 years. So <br />there's a lot of things that go on in our communities that are not necessarily reflective of <br />what we have in our codes, but we've allowed those to go on because we're not really <br />strong enforcement of our codes. And so things develop in the ohana that's somewhat <br />contrary to our code. So if we have somebody moving in to these unique communities, I <br />think they should understand what they're moving into first, before they start <br />complaining. So that's the one suggestion that I have. There's a cost benefit down the <br />road on that one. The other ones I'll write up, if you're still open to some. <br />CHAIR: We're definitely open to more input. <br />LEONARD: Okay. And also just to let you know, if you need more detailed information <br />on any of these from me, just please don't hesitate to call me or send me an email and let <br />me know. Because one of the questions I was expecting with regards to consolidation of <br />enforcement is that, is that a cost savings or is there an expense to that? And it all <br />depends on how it's set up, of course, because is there a transfer of assets from the <br />existing departments such as vehicles over to the new office that is created? Are you <br />going to have a new division head that runs that, so there's going to be a new layer of <br />management that may be an expense? If you cost that out, I mean, the savings there's <br />going to be a savings realized in years ahead, and if you automate it up front and you <br />streamline the process where you're ticketing people right at the front end, there's a <br />tremendous savings of costs with regards to administration. So I don't know I <br />anticipate some day to get into that discussion. And you're one heck of a typist. <br />CROSSON: I don't have it all. This is rough. <br />LEONARD: Well thank you very much for listening to me. <br />The members thanked Mr. Leonard for his presentation, and he wished them luck on the <br />job ahead of them. <br />Mr. Leonard left the meeting at 11:27 a.m. <br />The Chair called for a five - minute break. <br />The meeting was called back to order at 11:35 a.m. <br />The commissioners discussed Mr. Leonard's presentation and ideas, as follows: <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.