My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-11-03 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-11-03 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:08:31 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:08:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. SITKO: <br /> No requirements whatsoever. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br /> An example was we were looking at some property. It was seven and <br />a half acres of ocean front property and in the ad and the sales person represented it as <br />ag property, only $100 taxes. At one time it was listed as $2.5 million, and now it’s <br />down to about $1.5 million. I looked at all of the taxes that would pay $100 taxes for <br />several years. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Is it conservation land? <br />MR. SITKO: <br /> Yes. The minimum tax and they were probably in one of the ag programs <br />as pasture. So if you have seven acres, it’s $60 an acre. That comes down to below <br />the minimum tax amount. We have a minimum tax of $100. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br /> The neighbor next door we know them, and they said, well they told us <br />if we put a fence we would qualify for ag so we fenced one side of the property. And I <br />said have they ever done ag on it? He said no, they put a fence on, they molded it <br />when they put the fence and that’s the last time they done anything. <br />MR. SITKO: <br /> Once again, we have to be reactive. So if somebody does inform us at <br />this point, because we don’t have the ag specialist, we would be sending him out there <br />to go confirm this. Right now it has to be done with the zone appraiser who covers that <br />zone will have to go check. At that point, when you’re dealing with pasture, yes the <br />whole property has to be fenced in. There has to be water for some animals there. But <br />very honestly, you can run two goats on a property and they’d qualify. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> So the livestock doesn’t even have to be present for the inspection? <br />MR. SITKO: <br /> Not necessarily. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> And I just wanted to get back, you said the real property tax revenues <br />contribute 50 to 60% to the county’s revenue? <br />MR. SITKO: <br /> Yes. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Do you think the ag values that are placed right now, if somebody is in <br />ag, do you think it’s just right? Too low? Too high? <br />MR. SITKO: <br /> They’re unrealistic. I don’t know when exactly the last time they were <br />recalculated. Our ag specialist before we lost them to USDA again, had recalibrated <br />what more reasonable rates would be. I am going to say that for pasture, they really <br />didn’t move much. But for truck and gardening, orchards and others, yes they went up <br />considerably. They will have to be submitted to council and actually also by ordinance, <br />we have to rework them every five years now. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br /> One last question, is there any ordinance against it? Are you guys <br />considered, when someone owes $100 for ag or very low property tax, to consolidate <br />that into one bill instead of allowing two payments? <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.