My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-11-03 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-11-03 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:08:31 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:08:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. SAKO: <br /> It’ not clear in the County Code, however we have in the current year <br />budget set aside, is actually two different guarantee programs. And actually if your <br />credit is so bad, the bank, even with our guarantee, will not loan you the money, then <br />we have to loan you the money. And so there are two separate funds, and each one I <br />think we assign $50,000 in a current year, which is not a significant amount. Some of <br />the, it’s not all homeowners, but homeowner businesses in the Honokaa area, a couple <br />of them I think have started and are working on that. We’re trying to get the cost <br />figures. I guess some of them flow down, some go up, and there’s all those different <br />pumps and levels of difficulty getting those placed in. Part of the problems I think the <br />cesspools are in the back and the sewer is in the front. So there is a lot of changes that <br />have to take place. But we’re hoping that by knowing that we’ll get a lien on your home <br />if you default, that hopefully it would encourage payment to the banks will be willing to <br />accommodate them. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Would there be grant funds available to fund that program? <br />MS. SAKO: <br /> We’ve been looking, maybe we’re looking in the wrong place, but we <br />haven’t found any yet. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> That seems like that might be a grantable type of fund. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Any other discussion? <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br /> The only other comment I have is delinquencies on property, at least <br />the county has something they can go to. There’s tax liens, and sell it at a tax sale. For <br />all of the other delinquencies they can disappear, if the person dies or moves, or the <br />company is out of business, so the real property ones may not be aggressive as is the <br />tipping fees and things like that when you disappear quickly. The county is getting 12% <br />on the real property delinquencies and most of the property selling, you collect 12% per <br />year, so that’s better than getting at the bank. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> I just want to make sure we are capturing all these points so that we <br />can pull them out again. <br />DISCUSSION OF SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT PRESENTED AT OCTOBER 22 <br />MEETING <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay we’re on to discussion item 6. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> May I make a suggestion. Because it’s getting closes to the noon hour, <br />if you have reports from the subcommittees which is item 7, perhaps you want to <br />present them now so that we can be sure that you can discuss what’s in those reports <br />at the next meeting. Because if you don’t get there, then you’re two meetings away <br />from being able to discuss it. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay. I have a question relevant to that. If for instance the <br />technology subcommittee, if we put together a report from the meeting we had this <br />morning, and sent it to you rather than distribute it at a meeting, could it then go on the <br />29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.