My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-10-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:08:47 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. O’HARA: <br /> And I got to say, what Bill said, it’s really about policy. I mean there is <br />the law and we have to follow the law. But there is also the framework that we have <br />devised as a county to pursue contracts. And it can be exceedingly cumbersome. But <br />that’s just the acquiring the contracts side. Then there is the administering the contract <br />and there’s just not a real coherent system within the county.It certainly is not flawless, <br />let’s put it that way. And because of that, we do incur substantial additional cost in our <br />contracting. And so perhaps it is a policy discussion. I’m not really sure. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Well, one thing we could do is, I think you’re starting to identify areas <br />that you want to focus on. One was like technology. You wanted Data Systems to <br />come in and explain how Data Systems or technology can be improved in the county. <br />And maybe another one would be procurement and contracting. That would be another <br />topic. There may be others and we could possibly dedicate one meeting to having <br />people come in and just explain how government operates in these areas. And then <br />whatever committee has to follow up with will do their follow up. But it seems like we’re <br />talking about, like if it’s procurement, it would be more like operations. It would fall <br />under the Operations, Budgeting Committee. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br /> If we’re having the individuals like you mentioned, coming to the <br />commission, maybe the committee should be the whole commission – everybody. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Yeah. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Oh yeah. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> They could make presentations to the group as opposed to doing it <br />department by department. If you took functional areas and, if this commission would <br />identify areas that you want to learn more about from whoever deals with it, then that <br />could be a good start. And you could do it, depending on how many topics you have, <br />you could do it in one meeting and just devote that meeting to listening to these areas of <br />concern. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Let me ask, you’ve worked with the county, you’ve worked with state, I’ve <br />worked with the state and federal. I think the majority does have an understanding of <br />procurement contracting in local government. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> And I think that that’s a good start. Our knowledge may be real specific <br />to our experiences there. I don’t know how things are done today in 2010. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Same. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> I left the county in 2006, and so policy may have changed a little bit. But <br />I also worked for businesses that are under contract with the county and so I’ve seen <br />that side of it too. Things are not always done in a timely manner. And there are a lot <br />issues. And so is there an overall policy about how the county handles contracts? Is <br />DPW on a different track then the other departments still in terms of procurement? How <br />that all works, I mean, hearing the presentation is important from the procurement <br />department to get an understanding, but it’s also a good idea to get the feedback from <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.