Laserfiche WebLink
department, but the more operational? Okay, the whole county is, we’re going to move <br />to video conferencing so we’re not doing it piece meal. How does that happen within <br />the county? Obviously it would impact the procurement and contracts. <br />MS. CRAWFORD: <br /> I would say that in your example of video conferencing, we have not <br />formally established a county-wide policy or a sort of a mass purchasing. While there <br />might be some savings in going with a large scale video conferencing procurement and <br />establishment, we did not go that direction. It really has been the departments, I think in <br />their capacity, to take advantage of it. For instance, the Fire Department has stations all <br />around the island and they found that it would greatly enhance their efficiency and save <br />staffers time to video conference trainings and meetings, and they managed to set their <br />priorities for equipment purchases so that they could do that. In general, the policy I <br />could say, at the county, is that we support, that for increasing video conferencing as a <br />way to reduce the cost in mobile traveling to meetings, but have not tried to formalize a <br />certain type of procurement around that. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Would it make sense to you because that would maybe decrease <br />the number of vehicle requests. I don’t know. You’re the experts on this, but it just <br />seems to me to work more holistically, might make more sense. And I don’t know who <br />would do it if it’s not sort of the folks that are working on procurement who would have <br />these sort of larger issues unless it’s coming from the mayor’s office. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> There are sights, county sights scattered throughout the island that has <br />a video conferencing set up. So for instance the council room has a video conference <br />facility. The mayor’s office has one. The mayor’s office in Kona, the council office in <br />Kona. I’m not sure about other districts, but slowly I think we should be working up <br />towards getting like regional areas that different departments can use. The example <br />that Nancy gave on Fire Department is an unusual request. I don’t think departments <br />request their own video conferencing facility. It’s more like we should be encouraging <br />them to use what is currently available. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So what is the correct method for doing that when Gilbert sees <br />these requests coming in for this equipment, and so he knows that this department is <br />looking at it, and this department is looking at it? But if departments already vetted it <br />you sort of act on it. Where is that intersection between the request from the various <br />departments and going like maybe as a county we should embrace this a little bit more? <br />How does that happen? <br />MS. CRAWFORD: <br /> I think that’s back in the budgeting process. Because at budgeting <br />they’re putting in that request. And we’re probably more aware of where there are <br />already systems, the questions that we would ask. For instance if somebody who works <br />in the county building comes in and wants to get some video conferencing equipment, <br />we’re going to be asking about, we have video conferencing equipment. Is there some <br />compelling reason that you can’t take advantage of what already exists? Because we <br />actually, as Bill said, we’ve got very extensive video conferencing available now. Like in <br />the Finance office we don’t have our own video conferencing but we don’t have reason <br />to use it often enough to warrant having our own, so we would go down to the council <br />room and use that. Or others who have it, Prosecutor’s Office has video conferencing <br />13 <br /> <br />