My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-22 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-10-22 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:09:22 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:09:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
out what they do, that we want to do something with it to help them to do their work <br />better. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Any other discussion relating to our speakers we just had about <br />procurement? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Just a point that they brought up when I asked them about whether they <br />were incorporating green pricing language into their contracts and they said that’s a <br />policy issue that the county has not pressed that policy. If we look at this in context of <br />working with the energy team, it’s something that maybe the county should be looking at <br />more. There are models from the other counties to do this, the various types of <br />contracts that they’re pursuing annually. So, departments could identify what green <br />pricing affects them specifically, whether it be in fuels or vehicles or different areas of <br />construction. And whether that’s a policy that the county should be pursuing. <br />MS. WONG <br />: I was very pleased to find out that it is a centralized process. I think that <br />really helps. I was surprised that not all the County Council people had gone through <br />the process of understanding this. And I think it’s an important process to understand <br />when you’re in a leadership position. But when you’re making policies as the County <br />Council people do, they make policies, this will impact through the departments <br />perhaps. And they don’t know how difficult it is to process it down the lines. We might <br />consider if it’s the flavor what we got today that we recommend or suggest that all <br />County Council be required to go through at least an introduction of the procurement <br />process. I’m not recommending that as of yet. I’m just saying we might consider that. I <br />don’t know if that’s really necessary. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> It might be better for them after they’ve actually been sitting on the <br />County Council for a little bit of time so they can see how better it might liken them. <br />MS. WONG <br />: And I know what I went through with my training, when I read the <br />documents, not a clue. When someone was actually showing me how the paper <br />process went, I thought, oh my goodness, this is so long, and I kept trying to figure out <br />ways to cut down the process. Cannot do. There’s the state law. So you have to go by <br />the state law. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Anything else on that topic? If not we will go, now back up and go <br />to Correspondence. <br />CORRESPONDENCE <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> I have a motion to accept and file correspondence A through L, <br />which means we still have an opportunity to talk about those particular things when we <br />get to our subcommittee reports so it’s putting it off the table but just to accept and file A <br />through L? <br />MOTION:MR. MATSUDA: <br /> So moved. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Second. <br />27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.