My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:09:39 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:09:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. O’HARA: <br /> Oh yeah. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Any comments on that approach? I personally like the <br />interdisciplinary approach a little bit better. The first approach may be a little bit better <br />because the departmental approach is to combine that much is just almost an <br />insurmountable task. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> It really is. I agree with you. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> At this point we have 10 months to go. That’s my personal feeling <br />about it, but I would welcome others opinions about it. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> It kind of scared me. I don’t want to choose any of those. But it might be <br />that if we start of with the first option, we might eventually break down to the point, but <br />at this point, that thought kind of scares me. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> It could be that as we’re working on the other approach we’ll come <br />to an area that we’ll want to discuss say Parks and Recreation as a whole. We could <br />then focus on Parks and Recreation. If that seems to be some sort, there seems to be <br />some issues or suggestions that the team wants to bring forward. Comments? <br />MS. WONG: <br /> So, are we then saying we’re all agreeing on option one? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> I’m not sure. I just want to make sure people think that this a viable <br />way to approach it. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> And when you’re talking about A, you’re talking about Ms. O’Hara’s first <br />suggestion about breaking it down, consolidation, enhancing revenue and operation? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Well, we don’t have enough people to do four unless someone <br />wants to tackle on their own. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Could we look at operational and consolidation as together? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> True. That would be the logical one to do. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So we’re talking about breaking down into teams of two for the <br />following groups: <br />One would be addressing operational measures which is sort of a policy committee and <br />also tackling consolidation, potential consolidations, consolidations of activities or <br />functions as one. <br />Another would be looking at revenue enhancement opportunities, which may get <br />broaden down a little bit also into some of the cost saving issues. <br />Technology. Andy maybe things like the paper forms from the comments made can fall <br />into that committee. So, that means as we got these comments and suggestions in, <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.