My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:09:39 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:09:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> No, but that’s definitely going to be a consideration of how we do <br />that and how we get that as you expressed, Katherine, how we get that information, <br />back to the relevant departments for comment. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> One thing, as you divvy up your committees, I think Bill might have to <br />be on each committee in order for you to communicate with him because he’ll make, <br />there’ll be two who will then communicate to Bill and you’re the third board member <br />whether or not you’re ex-officio. So, I think you’ll have to be on all. Is that all right? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Yeah. I’m not sure what kind of meetings you’re going to have. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> You can be tasked but it’s really just so that they can communicate and <br />get information from you without having the Sunshine Law violation.So the two of you <br />might work together but if you need information so that he can provide it to you. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> That’s not a problem. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br /> That’s what he’s suggesting. He was suggesting that from that <br />beginning. But necessarily being on the committee but just being as an advisory <br />person. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Yes. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> No, I’m saying he has to be on the committee. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> I’ll be an ex-officio member. I think it’s important that all the <br />departments turn in their reports then you can analyze each department. There may be <br />some that may not want to even discuss it because there is nothing to discuss. After <br />reviewing what they write, we might want to decide who to talk to and who we don’t <br />need to talk to. I’m not sure if that’s going to happen, but it would be good to get all of <br />the reports in and look at it. There are some interesting ones from the individual <br />comments. They talked about technology. That’s another one that cuts across all of <br />the departments. Getting a better copy machine. It’s actually cheaper now to get a new <br />copy machine, with multi functions. It takes less space and maybe we can do a <br />recommendation across the board for all departments to evaluate the simple kind of <br />copy machines. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Well, I think as part of this agenda item, we’ll still get to how we <br />want to handle all those communications that come in so that we make sure that they <br />are addressed at some where, some way. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br /> Bill, on the questionnaire, how has the response been in the past as <br />to each department because if we don’t get a response can you require them? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> Yes. That’s why I just asked Kathy to keep track of who submitted and <br />who didn’t. I can send a reminder, but if for some reason somebody, after the reminder <br />they don’t submit – is there a deadline? <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.