My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:09:39 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:09:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ARMOUR: <br /> If they have to do a written response then they couldn’t come to the <br />next meeting anyway because don’t you have to have the response in the agenda <br />within seven days before the meeting? <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> What needs to be on the agenda can just be a generic one. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Responses from the departments. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> It depends on what you want to do with it. What it would be on the <br />agenda for is because you want to discuss it so it will be discussion regarding <br />responses from the departments. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Well, actually if they are going to come in it’s going as <br />communications and then we would discuss how to handle the responses under our <br />under item 7. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> That gives them then only a week until it comes in. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> We’ve got two weeks on the table, we have a month on the table, <br />can we compromise at three weeks? Which will give us still seven days before our <br />meeting. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Yes. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Three weeks. Okay, are we through with agenda item number 8? <br />That’s how we want to handle follow up from the previous report? I just want to make <br />sure we’re not creating busy work for them, but we’re actually going to pay attention to <br />this and can use this as some of our raw data that we’re going to be looking at in our <br />subcommittees. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> I agree, and that’s why I think it should only be used specifically the <br />2007 report and those departments that had more than one specific revenue. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Could I just jump back to seven a moment and I drew a big arrow for me <br />to pay attention on my notes and I just passed it by. But just to pose the idea, I was <br />reading the notes from last meeting, to get the public involved, if we had a workshop for <br />input from employees and the public, to get the union involved, ask the union if they <br />would sponsor the workshop to invite the employees to get feedback and the public. Do <br />you think that’s a possible, doable, or something that would be of interest? And the <br />reason that I looked at it this way is I’d like the union to get involved at some point. I <br />don’t really but, I was trying to think, our budget is very limited so if the union, and this <br />will help all the employees, the county employees, maybe the unions might be able to <br />facilitate and sponsor a meeting like that and invite the public. Just to pose that. We <br />don’t have to vote or discuss it. I just wanted to pose that idea and maybe we could <br />discuss on our next meeting. Or if anyone has any thoughts on that. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> It seems to me that we need to sort of get together with our teams <br />between now and our next meeting and strategize how we’re going to tackle this and <br />31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.