Laserfiche WebLink
collections for specific services becomes very difficult for the Finance Department. And <br />part of that is because our biggest segment I think of our cost are salaries and wages. <br />There’s only so much you can cut before you start having to cut back on services. <br />Impact fees –Wrong time and I don’t like it because it’s half of what I collect under fair <br />share. And the idea that you’re going to collect more through it or faster through it, it <br />means that I will collect some fees in Puna and Ka‘u, but it will cut in half of what I <br />collect in Kona. Because Kona is mainly new development. So, you pass the impact <br />fee at the proposed rate of $6,000, it immediately cuts my fair share assessment <br />against Palamanui by 50%. Kaloko Makai is going to be coming in to reclassify land. If <br />they came in we would access them at $12,000 under fair share. If they come in under <br />the impact fee as proposed by the council, they would be assessed at $6,000 per unit. <br />That’s my main opposition right now is that the area that I have the fastest growth which <br />is Kona occurring, that under the impact fee, it reduces our collections by 50%. And so <br />the reality is there is no political will to adopt an impact fee at 100% at the $12,000. And <br />that’s because every time somebody pulls a building permit for a house in Hawaiian <br />Paradise Park and they say, before you can get your building permit, you’ve got to <br />cough up $12,000 to the county before you build your house. What you’re going to hear <br />happen is guys are going to continue to build houses without permits in Ocean View <br />and other remote areas because they’re not going to have the $12,000 extra, cause <br />they haven’t factored that in. We’re not talking about a development. We’re talking <br />about aguy who bought a lot. He gets enough money to build a house and then you tell <br />him $6,000. Even $6,000 before he can get the building permit is real tough for guys. <br />And so the other problem I have is unless you’ve identified specific projects that you’re <br />going to expand that money on, are you even going to expand it in six years and at the <br />end of the six years I have to return it to people with interest. One of the other issues <br />with the assessments is just that in this economy right now I think where most of the <br />construction is occurring is in single family residences rather than big developments. <br />You impose the impact fee, then you basically are going to shut down some of that. <br />And somebody builds a house, we wouldn’t collect some revenue off the value of that <br />house. If the impact fee becomes an impediment than it’s just vacant land or illegal <br />structures which then I have to go and enforce. It is hell on wheels. We were going to <br />basically allow guys to come in and make their homes legal if you built without a <br />building permit. That’s easier said than done because you put your drywall up, well part <br />of the permit is we have to inspect the electrical. We have to inspect the plumbing. So <br />you have to rip off the drywall in order to get that inspection done. You also need to get <br />either an architect or an engineer to sign off on those plans after the fact. And so <br />anything that I view as resulting in more illegal structures,to me is just creating a huge <br />problem that we will have to deal with later. So, I view this impact fee as a problem. I <br />think that fair share is legally defensible and it does hit the new developments and it hits <br />them in the area that are most rapidly growing, which is Kona. So, I’m kind of happy <br />with the system as it is. I have people who’ve paid fair share but in theory, they’ve paid <br />like partial. And if the impact fee is passed, then I have to reassess what they owe. <br />And so they’re telling me that I don’t have to reimburse money if under the new scenario <br />they’ve now overpaid. But if they’ve only paid a portion, then I have to reassess, and <br />then they’ll not pay me anything more. And the problem is, is that in the Puna area <br />where there’s a tremendous demand for services, I think that it will make it harder. <br />We’re actually getting better at collecting as people build out we’re already starting to <br />use some of that money. But what people don’t understand is you don’t collect until <br />31 <br /> <br />