My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:10:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. WONG: <br /> So that would be policy, council. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> And I think it’s appropriate for recommendation to come from this <br />committee after we have learned a little bit more and can formulate some sort of <br />recommendation. <br />MR. BUKLAREWICZ: <br />What I was going to say is it is incorporated into the current <br />integrated resource solid waste management plan as an alternative means of revenue production <br />for helping the solid waste division generate revenue. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So why has the county chosen not to adopt any sort of pay as you throw? <br />It has been discussed. I know it has been discussed. But what are the barriers of the county? <br />MR. BUKLAREWICZ: <br />I think it’s just there is a lot of resistance to it. The biggest <br />resistance comes from the fact that there is a spike in illegal dumping once you institute a <br />program such as this but fact is communities that have adopted this they do experience that <br />spike in illegal dumping but then once education takes hold and everybody gets with the <br />program that level of illegal dumping does go down. The other objection is… I introduced this <br />to a…. It was a seminar on illegal dumping by the prosecutor’s office a couple of months ago <br />down in Oceanview and everybody got up in arms, they didn’t want to pay anymore fees for <br />whatever. So as soon as you introduce the idea of having to pay extra money everybody knocks <br />it down. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Well I don’t think that we would shy away from that. We’re not the <br />implementers but I think we should see the report. <br />MR. BUKLAREWICZ: <br />Yeah. In serving on that committee, the solid waste advisory <br />committee, I kind of got the sense that there is kind of a catch 22 in the solid waste area that the <br />more recycling gets done the fewer revenues come in to support the mission of the solid waste <br />division. So they were kind of ambivalent about the idea of incentivizing recycling because <br />then their budget is based on tipping fees that come in right. So more recycling, fewer tipping <br />fees coming in. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />But the tipping fees are only charged at the landfill at this point in time and <br />most residentials do not use the landfill. I personally just would like to say thank you Paul and I <br />would like to see this agendized in the future if we could get a copy of the report. It is a big <br />issue. Solid waste is underfunded by the tip fee and part of that is because as I pointed out 30% <br />of commercial businesses use our free transfer station system. So if we’re looking at enhancing <br />revenues to be able to support the programs that we need to be environmentally correct here <br />then I think this is something that we need to consider. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay any other questions for Paul? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />We’ll scan it in. <br />MR. BUKLAREWICZ: <br />Scan it and send me a copy too. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Thank you Paul. <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.