My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:10:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. NICHOHLSON: <br />I think it’s a good idea. I’m not sure what we would want to say yet at <br />this point but I think sort of being reflective on the experience and if we’re either saying we <br />should eliminate this or is there a way to put it together in a more effective way. <br />MS. WONG: <br />The beginning says this is how we went about what we did and sort of closing <br />the picture and saying this is what should go next. That’s what I’d like to suggest. <br />MS. NICHOLSON <br />:So part 3 would be? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Top 10 actions to take. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Unless we make it as part of an executive summary because the <br />recommendation about this commission may be already included in the report right. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I would like a summary either an executive summary or a conclusion that <br />provides prioritized recommendations.I think that’s great. I mean really if you can just bullet <br />it, these are the top ten recommendations for cost savings and revenue enhancement, that page <br />would be read. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So that would be our new part 3, a summary conclusion. Okay, good <br />recommendation. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Yeah, conclusions and recommendations. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay, now we are onto agenda item number 6. <br />DISCUSSION REGARDING ITEMS PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED TO BE <br /> <br />PLACED IN DRAFT REPORT: <br /> <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Did everyone have a chance to go through and actually do some serious <br />looking at what we have so far? I did but I’m not sure if we’ll get there. How did you tackle <br />this? Let’s start out generally because I basically just did wordsmithing and I didn’t really add a <br />lot of content and I only came up with one thing that I found totally confusing. But how did the <br />rest of you tackle this? Basically wordsmithing or did you? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Iactually didn’t work on that I worked on the other piece. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> That’s right you were exempt from this. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Sorry. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> And I thought I would take my way out by doing my draft. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Okay, so the three remaining standing here, Glen and Ken how did you <br />tackle this? <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />I took it individually. <br />31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.