My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:10:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. POMEROY: <br />Well important agricultural lands was, you might know this, mandated in <br />2008 that the county needs to designate important agricultural lands. I’m not an expert on that <br />topic but what that does is it gives incentives to property owners that have the best ag land to <br />designate their land as agricultural under IAL. There’s tax incentives for them to do that. <br />There’s farm labor housing allowances that they would get that they don’t normally get and <br />some other things in the package that would give them incentive to do that because the idea of <br />designating important ag lands is to keep the land in agriculture rather than development. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> So how does that generate more money for the county if you’re looking at <br />tax incentives? So these are county tax incentives then for the most part? <br />MS. POMEROY: <br />I’m not sure if it’s also state or just county. I don’t have the answer to that. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> We had some discussion, Ken, maybe you can recall because you were <br />kind of looking at this, of use of agricultural lands and some people who claim use of <br />agricultural lands that perhaps are not really agricultural lands. But you’re sort of on the other <br />side of that. You’re talking about encouraging agricultural lands. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />I think this is two different issues. I don’t understand this whole program <br />that you… My understanding is that under this program that Kathie’s talking about you have <br />100 acres and you say I want to dedicate this to agriculture so you sign a kind of contract to put <br />that land into agriculture. The other thing that we were talking about is if somebody has 4 acres <br />or 10 acres, they put a fence around it and then they go apply and say this is agriculture now and <br />they get tax benefits by doing that. The county says all right you qualify so now your taxes are <br />$100 or $150 a year and that’s no commitment at all on the land owner. <br />MS. POMEROY: <br />Ithink you have to backup even another step before that because <br />designating important ag lands is about making maps because we don’t really have a picture of <br />what the best ag lands are now. We need to get all the data that we have already and find out <br />what is the best land for ag. So that’s the first step. I just want to put that in because some <br />people fence their rocky area in Kawaihae and it gets counted as ag. We’re talking about land <br />that can be productive. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />The second part was that anybody can do it if they think they can get an <br />agricultural exemption. They’re supposed to justify it by actually doing agriculture but in our <br />conversation we had there’s some lands that they fence up two sides of it and then they go and <br />get a permit or not even a permit, they file for agricultural lands and they never do anything on <br />it to get the tax break. <br />MS. POMEROY: <br />Yeah well this is… Important ag lands is to help prevent that kind of setup <br />like Kohala ranch or any number of developments that are really not agriculturally productive. <br />So getting back to the whole statement; Collaborate with Public Works and Real Property Tax <br />Division to create efficiency and opportunity incentives for important ag lands. I think <br />important ag lands are our number one priority for the Ag Advisory Commission right now to <br />try to get this designated and followed through. It’s been mandated. So the whole picture of <br />that happening is a step in the direction of having more efficiency and opportunity incentives <br />for agriculture. It’s like the most important step that needs to be done right now and it costs <br />money so it’s kind of been put off and put off and is still being put off. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />It costs money for the farmers or for the county? <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.