My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-04-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:10:27 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:10:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. POMEROY: <br />I think they don’t but what they do is well I shouldn’t speak because Eric <br />Tanouye is a nursery person so he would know a lot more about that but when you process an <br />ag product you have to have a certain infrastructure in place… <br />MS. OHARA: <br />Right. I understand the infrastructure piece but in terms of the actual product I <br />don’t know that the county actually gets involved in any permit processing. <br />MS. POMEROY: <br /> Yeah, I’m not sure about that, beyond mailing invasive species and stuff <br />like that but I can find out. So a letter addressed to Cost of Government Commission? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />You can send it to Kathy Garson and it will come to us from her. <br />MS. POMEROY: <br />Okay. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Another thing, under number 3 identify ways to enhance revenue and <br />revenue collections for the county, the last thing is decrease purchases of imports. Can you <br />explain that a little bit? Who is the purchaser of the imports? Are you talking about the county <br />purchasing imports? <br />MS. POMEROY: <br /> Well the county does and everything is set up in the state and county level <br />and private sector for importing. So one of our goals is to produce more food for this island, be <br />more food self sufficient and a big part of that is about not just growing the food but all the <br />infrastructures in place for importing. So to relate it to ways to enhance revenue and revenue <br />collections within the county if we were more self sufficient we would be having the money <br />stay here rather than going to the mainland or overseas. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I’m not sure what we can make of that. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I fully understand the argument it has been around a long time. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Yeah, I think we totally support…. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Import substitution. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Yeah. But I’m trying to tie it back to revenue collection for the county. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />It would improve the quality of life for our citizens. <br />MS. POMEROY: <br /> Well wouldn’t you collect more revenue if we were having a busier <br />business economy here? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Definitely. <br />MS.O’HARA: <br /> Well yes and no. Some of that accrues to the state as we’re pointing out. The <br />county doesn’t receive direct taxes like GE taxes so yes and no, most of our revenue comes <br />from our property taxes but there is a spill over for the county in terms of benefits and there’s <br />definitely a spill over for the residents of the county the more we can substitute imported foods, <br />absolutely. So yeah we recognize that. <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.