My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-03-23 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-03-23 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:10:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. NICHOLSON: <br />This would require timely posting of transcripts online. And then Ken <br />wanted to add something about in lieu of the…. What did you have Ken? <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />Something like the current videotaping system or process. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />In lieu of the current contracted videotaping services. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />As a side note, if we think this is a good idea then we should also put in that <br />it would increase the availability to all county residences. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />That’s a good thing to add in because I think it would increase the <br />availability. Anything else? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Ifound these items that you discussed in the last meeting and actually they <br />were passed forward they just didn’t make it there. The things you just revised they were <br />supposed to be in the recommendations for this agenda. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />All these? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Yeah but now you’ve revised it. So sorry. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />That’s all right we would have revised them anyway. Okay onto <br />discussions from the operations, budget, consolidation committee. So we need to decide where <br />these things will go as we discuss them we need to figure out…. Or did we do that last meeting, <br />figure out where they go? <br />MS. WONG: <br /> No, we did not. We read off the list and discussed what we had said and left it at <br />that and said we would discuss it at the next meeting. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay so item 1 Executive Assistant/Volunteer Coordinator. Having read <br />this I was totally at a loss of really what this is about. I needed a lot more explanation of what <br />this was and what it was for. I wasn’t at the last meeting so that’s why. But having read it cold <br />I went hmm. <br />MS. WONG: <br />The volunteer program was something that I think we had discussed and didn’t <br />pass it through as going forward but just to be clear it would be someone employed by the <br />county to be a volunteer coordinator. Volunteer coordinator outside financed by corporate <br />sponsors. So someone in the county that could be a liaison for services in the county because <br />someone from the outside would not know where the resources were and someone paid… It’s <br />sort of like public private partnership. From the outside finance wise there would be a corporate <br />sponsor for projects. For example, the tsunami, getting people involved as the county would <br />need and as different community areas would need. Whatever programs would need to have <br />training for the people that would be involved and part of the thought was that a lot of senior <br />citizens or people that are on furlough or unemployed would have some platform for still using <br />their services, being active in the community.I just saw on t.v. this morning President Obama <br />talking about serve.gov, get the community involved and so I was the one that sort of put that <br />concept together. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So the recommendation is to hire or create two new positions, one would <br />be funded by county and one would be funded by outside groups. <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.