My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-12-19 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-12-19 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:19:20 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:11:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved to accept the wording for the Prosecuting <br />Attorney's Office on page 13, with changing only the last sentence to plurals, that "no <br />recommendations were made." Ms. Nicholson seconded the motion, and all commissioners <br />present voted aye. <br />The commissioners continued on to XIX, Public Works, on page 13 of the draft. <br />Regarding "A," pursuing negotiations with the union to go to a 10 -hour, 4 -day work <br />schedule for employees, the secretary explained that she did not see where the reason for the <br />recommendation was clearly stated, and thus left it blank for them to fill it. <br />Ms. Nicholson recalled that transportation to and from a job site, as well as building <br />morale, had to do with the reason. Traveling to and from distant job sites ate up much of the <br />employees' work day, so it would be a morale - builder for them if their work days were changed <br />to be 10 hours long, 4 days per week. <br />Ms. Nicholson suggested the following wording for the explanation: "Because of the <br />distances traveled to many work sites, Highway Maintenance Division personnel often spend a <br />significant portion of their work time getting to and from work sites and mobilizing job site <br />equipment. A 10 -hour work schedule would mean more efficient time on the job as well as an <br />increase to the morale of the Highway Maintenance employees." She said they could look at the <br />next draft of the report at the next meeting and fine -tune this explanation. <br />The Chair said he liked Ms. Nicholson's wording, as he wanted the word "efficient" in <br />the explanation. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to accept the recommendations as presented in <br />Draft 1 for Public Works, with the addition of the explanation regarding pursuing a 10 -hour, 4- <br />day work schedule for Highway Maintenance employees. Mr. Joseph seconded the motion, and <br />all commissioners present voted aye. <br />The commissioners continued on to page 14 of Draft 1, XX, Research and Development. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved to include the wording that "Jane Testa was <br />present for the meeting on Research and Development, and after reviewing and discussing the <br />responses from Ms. Testa, no recommendations were made." Ms. Nicholson seconded the <br />motion, and all commissioners present voted aye. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved to accept the wording for the Transit Agency, XXI <br />in Draft 1, with the amendment of changing the last sentence to be plural. Ms. Nicholson <br />seconded the motion, and all commissioners present voted aye. <br />The commissioners continued on to XXII, Water Supply, in Draft 1 of the report. <br />Mr. Joseph noted that the Water Supply Department never responded to the COGC's <br />questionnaire. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.