My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-12-19 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-12-19 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:19:20 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:11:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
new approaches and strategies other municipalities use to solve problems. In the long run, this <br />would improve government efficiency and operations." <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson approved to accept page 2 of the draft, with the <br />amended wording on recommendation IA, the amended background /explanation on IB, and with <br />II and III remaining as written. Mr. Joseph seconded the motion, and all commissioners present <br />voted aye. <br />The commissioners continued on to page 3 of the draft. <br />The Chair asked whether "g" on the agenda (recommend that all new managers receive <br />training on legal, contractual, and procurement issues specific to their departments) should go in <br />the report under the Office of the Corporation Counsel, with the changes discussed at today's <br />meeting regarding the training being overseen by the Office of the Corporation Counsel. <br />Ms. Noda said she would recommend that it stay listed with all departments, and it could <br />also be added under Corporation Counsel, to cross - reference it. <br />Ms. Nicholson said that departments might look up only their own department in the final <br />report and that perhaps department -wide recommendations should be listed under each <br />department so they are picked up. Mr. Joseph said he would rather see recommendations for all <br />departments, Roman Numeral I, listed in the index. He would not like the redundancy of listing <br />them after each department. <br />Ms. Nicholson asked whether all departments would receive the report and have to <br />respond. Ms. Noda said the report would go to the Mayor and it would be his prerogative from <br />there. <br />The Chair said the intent of the COGC is more for the Mayor. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved to accept page 3 of the draft with no changes. Ms. <br />Nicholson seconded the motion, and all commissioners present voted aye. <br />(A recess was called. The meeting took a break from 11: 06 a. m. to 11:15 a. m., at which <br />time the Chair called the meeting back to order.) <br />The commissioners continued on to page 4 of Draft 1. <br />Mr. Joseph said he did not like Hawaiian Telcom being mentioned, and would rather say <br />"private service." Ms. Nicholson agreed and said the sentence should end right there. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to adopt item "B" on page 4 as just amended, <br />and to adopt items "C" through "G" as presented in the draft. Ms. Stremski seconded the <br />motion, and all commissioners present voted aye. <br />The commissioners continued on to page 5, number VII. <br />0J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.