My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-07 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-09-07 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:18:23 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:12:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
systems, state and local. The State has the manpower right now to handle its roads, which are <br />wider and thicker than County roads due to federal funding. <br />Ms. Nicholson asked why the County cannot get federal funding, and Mr. Kamelamela <br />said he was told that the federal government wants to go through a state agency, which is why <br />there is a State Transportation Division. The County is able to partnership with the State to get <br />some of the federal monies, however. <br />Mr. Kamelamela said there is a concern with the State Department of Transportation <br />doing the study on the road transfer. It needs to be ensured that the money will trickle down to <br />the counties. Mr. Sakaguchi said it is not to the State's advantage to transfer the roads, as they <br />would rather keep the money and power. <br />Mr. Joseph said it should have been the COGC's agenda that brought Mr. Kamelamela to <br />the meeting rather than the newspaper's article, as the paper has the tendency to exploit the most <br />controversial issues and forget about the other items. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi thanked Mr. Kamelamela for his clarification, and Mr. Kamelamela left <br />the meeting at 10:25 a.m. <br />[The following section of the minutes, in italics, is verbatim.] <br />STREMSKI: That article. I apologize if I spoke out of turn. <br />CHAIR: Why? <br />STREMSKI: Because I probably should not have said anything. <br />CHAIR: I didn't even see the article, so -- <br />STREMSKI: - -I know. <br />CHAIR: I think I don't know <br />SAKAGUCHI: --No, it's not your fault. Don't worry about that. <br />STREMSKI: No, I didn't want to <br />CHAIR: I think any commissioner is subject to the public, and that's <br />STREMSKI: I wanted to tell him I didn't want to talk to him, but I didn't know if I'd get in <br />trouble for that. <br />CHAIR: No, no, you wouldn't get in trouble for that. But would say whatever comment <br />you give to the public any commissioner is free to speak to the public. As long as you don't <br />make a comment, I guess, that would be more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.