My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-07 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-09-07 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:18:23 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:12:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
toward the end part, where it's kind of hard to discern which is a recommendation and which is <br />already preliminarily decided. <br />STREMSKI: I told him directly. I could speak to what I said. Nothing has been decided, <br />definitely. <br />SAKAGUCHI: Yeah, yeah. <br />STREMSKI: And I told him I don't know even if I'm supposed to be talking to you. I really <br />don't want to. <br />SAKAGUCHI: I appreciate that. I know it's hard to get a reporter off your back. <br />STREMSKI: Oh, yeah, especially when I'm waiting for a call from my daughter, who was in an <br />accident just before that, you know. I would never have answered the phone if it wasn't for that. <br />But if I spoke out of turn I apologize <br />SAKAGUCHI: - -I don't think anyone's blaming you. <br />CHAIR: I don't think anything is out of line or anything is out of place as far as any <br />comments to a reporter, to the public. And a reporter is most certainly free to write that article. <br />I don't think you have any basis for reprimanding a reporter for doing his job. And if it says in <br />there that it's to be decided today, that's what we're doing. And I don't see any violation in <br />there, from what was spoken. I didn't read it. I personally didn't read it. But do you see <br />anything in there that's in violation, or <br />GARSON: Well, I don't think there's any sort of violation. You are all free to decide whether <br />or not you're going to speak, whether or not you want to designate Myles to speak, or, you know, <br />that's happened before. I represent the Water Board. I've cautioned them before, too, you <br />know, but to make sure that they they've represented as themselves. But that also doesn't <br />mean the reporter's gong to print that <br />CHAIR: - -Going to print, yeah <br />GARSON: --Because, you know, like you said, I'm only representing this is my personal <br />opinion. They're going to take whatever they want, right, from what you say, so they're not <br />going to print that, you know, whether or not you say it. So, you know. <br />CHAIR: I think sometimes something like that is kind of healthy, to get input. I mean, we <br />got input from Corporation Counsel, from Mr. Kamelamela, on an issue that was brought up. <br />But sometimes criticism is healthy, so I really don't see a problem with the article for myself. <br />SAKAGUCHI: Yeah. I'm not above your right that criticism is good, but at the appropriate time. <br />After we have finally decided on these things, I think no problem if any member of the public <br />says I think you're really wrong and can I give you my input. I think <br />CHAIR: - -I think this is the appropriate time, personally. I think this is the appropriate <br />time for criticism, when the agenda goes out and we are going to discuss this, and someone has <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.