My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-07-20 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-07-20 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:17:45 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:12:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to recommend that the Highway Maintenance <br />Division of the Department of Public Works pursue negotiations with the union to go to a 10- <br />hour, 4 -day work schedule for employees. Mr. Joseph seconded the motion. Ms. Stremski said <br />she agreed. After no further discussion, the Chair called for a vote and all members voted aye. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved to recommend that the County try to incorporate <br />or consolidate all the State highways into the County highways system, as Mr. Nakasone felt it <br />would be more efficient and for home rule. Ms. Stremski seconded the motion. All members <br />voted aye. <br />The Chair said that a good point was made about hiring out grant writers instead of <br />employing them in- house, but he noted that hiring grant writers was on the list of <br />recommendations. So, this issue could be discussed when they get there on their list. <br />Motion: Ms. Nicholson moved that the Building Division's budget request for more <br />training, conference, and travel funds be increased, if possible, into the next budget cycle. Ms. <br />Stremski seconded the motion. <br />Discussion: Mr. Joseph said he was confused on this issue, as Mr. Kajikawa had said <br />that he cannot add to his budget and that it does not increase. However, when a budget is being <br />made, aren't recommendations to increase taken into consideration? The Chair said that Mr. <br />Kajikawa said his increases always got taken out. He did not know if that happened at the <br />division level, department level, mayor, or County Council level. However, he got the <br />impression the requests were made but denied. <br />Mr. Joseph said he would prefer in the motion wording that the travel budget be <br />"adequately funded" rather than "increased." <br />Motion withdrawn: Ms. Nicholson withdrew her motion, and Ms. Stremski withdrew <br />her second. <br />Ms. Nicholson said they could recommend increased opportunities for training, <br />conferences, and meetings for the Building Division staff to broaden their knowledge. Ms. <br />Provalenko said that there are opportunities, but if there is no funding, how could it be done? <br />Mr. Joseph noted that on their draft list of recommendations, item 12 is about providing <br />professional development opportunities for departmental staff and felt that covers the wording of <br />the motion they were trying to make. <br />Ms. Nicholson said it was interesting, though, that Mr. Nakasone seemed to feel they did <br />not need more in this area. However, the Building Division seemed to need it. <br />The commissioners discussed how to word a motion in this regard. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Joseph moved that they recommend the Building Division be <br />provided with an adequate travel budget in which certification and training opportunities would <br />be available to staff. Ms. Nicholson seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.