My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-07-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-07-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:17:32 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:12:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20. DISCUSSION /ACTION ON FIRE COMMISSION RESPONSE TO THE <br />COMMISSION'S LETTER DATED APRIL 10, 2006 <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to file the response, Ms. Provalenko seconded <br />the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />10. DISCUSSION /ACTION ON OFFICE OF AGING RESPONSE TO THE <br />COMMISSION'S LETTER DATED APRIL 10, 2006 <br />Ms. Garson told the commissioners that as they review the responses, they need to be <br />conscious about how much time is left in terms of revisiting. It would be good if they could <br />finish talking to everyone by the end of the year and then work intensively on compiling their <br />report. They need to determine if it is clear what the responses are telling them, and if so, they <br />can make a recommendations without having to call a representative in to talk to, as long as they <br />felt comfortable. <br />Ms. Nicholson said that there was nothing in Aging's response from which to cull a <br />recommendation. Ms. Garson stated that she is not very familiar with them but knows they <br />receive quite a few grants, and the services they provide the community are great. Ms. <br />Nicholson remarked that Aging seemed almost entrepreneurial compared to other departments. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to file the Office of Aging report, Ms. <br />Stremski seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />Ms. Provalenko mentioned that she just learned Aging got the Sun Sun Lau grant. Mr. <br />Sakaguchi asked whether Aging would have gotten the grant to do this if there were not a <br />Commission on Aging. Ms. Stremski said it depends on who heads the department and that Alan <br />Parker really hustles. Also, there are many services which are done on a volunteer basis. <br />Ms. Nicholson said that Aging has a vision, and they pursue fulfilling it. Some other <br />departments might not have a vision, or they purely provide services in a way that is totally <br />different from Aging. <br />Ms. Provalenko said that Aging is different from other departments, as its work force is <br />comprised of volunteers. This could not be done with other departments, such as Planning, <br />where education and other qualifications are needed. <br />The Chair said issues that Aging deals with are repetitive, in the sense that they are not <br />changing. Everybody is going to go through the same process, so there are not as many variables <br />to deal with. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi asked what makes Aging more entrepreneurial or successful than other <br />departments, and Ms. Stremski said it has many seniors who volunteer their time and talents. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.