My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-07-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-07-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:17:32 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:12:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
because it is not necessarily recreational land. So if they are going to ask about this, they should <br />also ask about the commission under Finance, where it would fall, and what it means to them in <br />terms of increasing their budget and staff. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi said a letter of inquiry may do it, inquiring who is to manage the land that <br />is acquired. <br />Ms. Provalenko asked if any other department could do it, and the Chair said no. <br />Motion and Vote: Mr. Sakaguchi moved to file the communication, Ms. Stremski <br />seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />(Mr. Sakaguchi indicated that he would need to leave the meeting, which would cause the <br />quorum to be lost.) <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to defer items 13, 15 through 18, 21 through <br />23, and 25 through 28 and carry them over to the next agenda. Ms. Stremski seconded the <br />motion, and all members voted aye. <br />29. DISCUSSION /ACTION REGARDING PRIORITIZING DEPARTMENTS/ <br />BOARDS /COMMISSIONS OR ISSUES TO ACCOMPLISH THE MANDATE OF <br />THE COST OF GOVERNMENT COMMISSION <br />The Chair stated that on their list of departments they had Environmental Management, <br />Public Works, Planning, Police, and Data Systems, in that order, and asked if any department <br />should be added. <br />Ms. Provalenko said they should add Civil Service. <br />Ms. Nicholson said they should add Civil Service and Research and Development. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Provalenko moved to add the Civil Service Department to their <br />list; Mr. Sakaguchi seconded the motion; and all members voted aye. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to add Research & Development to their list; <br />Ms. Stremski seconded the motion; and all members voted aye. <br />Ms. Garson asked that she be given another option in case Mr. Nakasone was not <br />available for the next meeting, and the Chair said that Planning would be next. <br />Ms. Garson asked them whether they would be finished with Public Works after talking <br />to Mr. Nakasone. Ms. Nicholson said that Public Works had other divisions: Automotive, <br />Building, Engineering, and Traffic. If they were to talk to one more, it should be the Building <br />Division. <br />Ms. Garson said that the Building Division handles the building permit process. The <br />Engineering Division handles building County items such as bridges and culverts. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.